2018
DOI: 10.1177/0894439317750840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Screening for News and Digital Divides

Abstract: Second screening is a relatively new set of media practices that arguably empower audiences to shape public narratives alongside news organizations and political elites. But in developing countries such as Colombia, it is important to examine who participates in this process, as substantial inequalities in both access to and use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) persist. This study examines how socioeconomic status (SES) relates to the adoption of second screening practices in Colombia, a co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, this suggests that other forms of using social media may indeed have distinct consequences through NFM perception. For instance, consuming "ambience news" within the current context of second screeningusing multiple devices and screens to interact with information at the same time such as news on TV, on smartphones, and/or laptops (Gil de Zúñiga & Liu, 2017, Barnidge, Diehl, & Rojas, 2019;Chadwick, O'Loughlin, & Vaccari, 2017) may lead to similar consequences. In such a context, people may feel they are well informed, and can rely on peers to be informed, although they may feel they still need to actively seek news to further verify facts, discuss public affairs issues, or simply to learn more about political issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, this suggests that other forms of using social media may indeed have distinct consequences through NFM perception. For instance, consuming "ambience news" within the current context of second screeningusing multiple devices and screens to interact with information at the same time such as news on TV, on smartphones, and/or laptops (Gil de Zúñiga & Liu, 2017, Barnidge, Diehl, & Rojas, 2019;Chadwick, O'Loughlin, & Vaccari, 2017) may lead to similar consequences. In such a context, people may feel they are well informed, and can rely on peers to be informed, although they may feel they still need to actively seek news to further verify facts, discuss public affairs issues, or simply to learn more about political issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From such a perspective, the Second Screen seems to have all the prerequisites to become an instrument to share experience and produce media and public opinion. The Second Screen should stimulate the audience interest in publishing personal perspectives [7]. Multiple works consider Second Screens with social media integration as a good instrument to receive public opinion [14].…”
Section: Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable works from a variety of perspectives exist for Second Screen [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The applicability and research goals can be classified by the target audience, considering both local and remote users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital divide was found to be mostly income-determined in early studies (e.g., Hoffman & Novak, 1998), and differences in ICT use and use purposes are still reflecting many of the existing inequalities in the society (Haight, Quan-Haase, & Corbett, 2014). However, as access to basic telecommunications started to widespread, other factors emerged as key determinants of the use of ICT (Barnidge, Diehl, & Rojas, 2019). Differences in educational levels reverberate in the use of computers (Shelley et al, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%