1928
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1928)56<79:sposea>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Phase of Streamflow Experiment at Wagon Wheel Gap, Colo.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. According to equation (1), R/P changes with P/PET and m within the theoretical range defined by the five boundaries of P/ PET ¼ 0, P/PET ¼ N, R/P ¼ 1 (m ¼ 1), R/P ¼ 0 (P/PETo1 and m-N) and R/P ¼ 1 À (P/PET) À 1 (P/PET41 and m-N), which are shown in Fig. 1a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1. According to equation (1), R/P changes with P/PET and m within the theoretical range defined by the five boundaries of P/ PET ¼ 0, P/PET ¼ N, R/P ¼ 1 (m ¼ 1), R/P ¼ 0 (P/PETo1 and m-N) and R/P ¼ 1 À (P/PET) À 1 (P/PET41 and m-N), which are shown in Fig. 1a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using data on global annual runoff (R) and precipitation (P) (http://www.sage.wisc.edu/atlas/maps.php?datasetid=41&includerelatedlinks=1&dataset=41) and PET (http://www.cgiar-csi.org/ data/global-aridity-and-PET-database), we calculated the global P/PET and hence estimated global m values according to equation (1). The estimated global m values and global wetness index (P/PET) were then used as inputs to equations (2) and (3) to calculate the global sensitivities of R/P to P/PET and m. Finally, the global sensitivities of R/P to P/PET and m were used to calculate the relative contributions of P/PET and m to R/P according to equations (13) and (14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first half of the 20th Century, catchment studies in Continental Europe and in the USA indicated that forestry could reduce total streamflow relative to grassland (Engler, 1919;Bates and Henry, 1928;Keller, 1988;Swank and Crossley, 1988). At first, scientists and engineers in Britain assumed that these findings were not relevant to UK conditions due to physical differences, particularly in climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of forest harvesting on hydrology in general and streamfl ow in particular have been the subject of practical concern and scientifi c investigation for decades (Bates and Henry, 1928;Bosch and Hewlett, 1982;Stednick, 1996). Numerous studies have attempted to quantify the potentially negative impacts of different forest practices on hydrology, water quality and aquatic habitat (e.g., Hicks et al, 1991;Macdonald et al, 2003) as well as the potential benefi ts in the form of increased water yield through forest management, particularly in relation to effects on snow accumulation and melt (e.g., Rich, 1972;Gottfried, 1991;Troendle et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%