2008
DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.3.313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-order facial information processing in schizophrenia.

Abstract: This study investigated the processing of second-order relational face information in schizophrenia. Twenty-eight schizophrenic patients and 28 controls were asked to say whether the space between the eyes was the same in 2 side-by-side faces. The 2 faces were derived from the same original face, but the spacing between the eyes was either the same or differed by various distances. The results showed that schizophrenic patients needed a space that was twice as great as controls to see a difference. The authors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for the divergence in all previous studies is that those medicated patients displayed impairment in a selective type of configural manipulation (i.e., second-order information) but still relied on some degree of configuration information (i.e., first-order or thirdorder information), which explains why they still exhibited an inversion effect as did healthy controls (Chambon et al, 2006;Schwartz et al, 2002). In line with this, Baudouin et al (2008) demonstrated that patients specifically displayed impairment in the manipulation of second-order information, whereas thirdorder information processing was somewhat maintained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…One possible explanation for the divergence in all previous studies is that those medicated patients displayed impairment in a selective type of configural manipulation (i.e., second-order information) but still relied on some degree of configuration information (i.e., first-order or thirdorder information), which explains why they still exhibited an inversion effect as did healthy controls (Chambon et al, 2006;Schwartz et al, 2002). In line with this, Baudouin et al (2008) demonstrated that patients specifically displayed impairment in the manipulation of second-order information, whereas thirdorder information processing was somewhat maintained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Irregularities in face processing are a common characteristic of some human neuropsychiatric conditions. Patients with schizophrenia, for example, have been shown to exhibit impairments in configural face processing (Baudouin et al, 2008;Joshua & Rossell, 2009;Shin et al, 2008) aberrant facial emotion processing (see for review Morris et al, 2009), and abnormal gaze patterns during face viewing, including avoidance of the eyes (Loughland et al, 2002;Phillips & David, 1998;Williams et al, 1999). Neural correlates of these impairments have been documented, including attenuated amplitudes for event related potential components associated with face processing (Feuerriegel et al, 2015;McCleery et al, 2015), and structural and functional abnormalities in face processing areas such as the fusiform gyrus (P. J.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we looked into the development of this sensitivity by considering a new indicator of perceptual sensitivity, namely discriminability thresholds (i.e., the minimal feature spacing a participant is able to detect) at each age. The procedure and materials were the same as those used by Baudouin, Vernet, and Franck (2008) with schizophrenics, with 7-, 9-, and 11-year-olds and adults being asked to state whether the distance between the eyes was the same in two side-by-side faces. The two faces were the same except for the eye spacing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%