2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of perceptual sensitivity to second-order facial relations in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 8-year-olds required a much greater mismatch in the direction of gaze than the adults to reliably detect the mismatch. This is consistent with findings that children in this age range are less sensitive than adults in making other judgments about spatial relations in both faces and non-face stimuli (Baudouin et al, 2010;Hadad, Maurer, & Lewis, 2010a;Hadad, Maurer, & Lewis, 2010b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 8-year-olds required a much greater mismatch in the direction of gaze than the adults to reliably detect the mismatch. This is consistent with findings that children in this age range are less sensitive than adults in making other judgments about spatial relations in both faces and non-face stimuli (Baudouin et al, 2010;Hadad, Maurer, & Lewis, 2010a;Hadad, Maurer, & Lewis, 2010b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Children are not as sensitive as adults to the alignment of abutting lines (Vernier acuity) (see Skoczenski & Norcia, 1999) or to the distance between the eyes (Baudouin, Gallay, Durand, & Robichon, 2010). Given the protracted developmental trajectory for those skills, we suspected that children might also not be as sensitive to small shifts in eye position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a study by Gilchrist and McKone (2003), in which internal facial stimuli were shown without external facial stimuli, the authors found a pattern of sensitivity to second-order relationships in the 7-year-old participants that was similar to that in adults. However, in a study by Baudouin, Gallay, Durand, and Robichon (2010), 7-year-olds did not show the aforementioned adult-like sensitivity to second-order relationships when identifying natural faces. Indeed, accounting for the interaction between internal and external facial areas is central to clarifying the developmental differences in facial processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We chose to test 7-and 9-year-olds because in this age range, children's basic visual functions (e.g., acuity, contrast sensitivity) become adult-like. However, even at age 9, some high-level visual functions (e.g., matching facial identities across views; discriminating small differences in the spacing of facial features; sensitivity to biological motion) are still not adult-like (Baudouin, Gallay, Durand, & Robichon, 2010;De Heering, Rossion, & Maurer, 2012;Hadad, Maurer, & Lewis, 2011;Mondloch, Geldart, Maurer, & Le Grand, 2003). Moreover, 7-and 9-year-olds are in the age range during which there are face-specific increases in memory (Weigelt et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%