2020
DOI: 10.4324/9781315181752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Language Acquisition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers (e.g. Gass, , Behney and Plonsky, 2013) argue that extensive practice may not be sufficient for the development of automatic processes.…”
Section: Automaticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some researchers (e.g. Gass, , Behney and Plonsky, 2013) argue that extensive practice may not be sufficient for the development of automatic processes.…”
Section: Automaticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include fast, parallel, effortless, free capacity, unintentional, unconscious behaviours emerging from consistent practice. Notwithstanding the applicability of these characteristics in researching automaticity in different contexts and for varying purposes, Gass et al (2013) argue that the most central of these characteristics in SLA is that automatic L2 performance involves "fast, unconscious and effortless processing" (p. 256). If we take these three characteristics as central to understanding and evaluating automaticity, then we will need a set of concrete and observable means that allow researchers to examine and evaluate automaticity in a more objective and observable manner.…”
Section: Automaticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well established in SLA that multiple methods, a range of disciplinary inputs, and a range of data types are needed to explore language learning (as clearly established in, e.g., Gass, Behney, & Plonsky, 2014). The same point is made by researchers in other fields, notably psychology (see Ellis, 2019).…”
Section: Conclusion—the Language Learning Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers are different due to the variability in their personalities such as field dependent versus field independent, extrovert versus introvert, risk taking versus risk-avoiding, along with aptitude, attitude, motivation, affective factors, and so on (Gass & Selinker, 2009;Saville-Troike, 2010;& Gass, Behney, & Plonsky, 2013). These variables are the parameters to identify personality traits of the teachers, whose roles are dependent on different contexts inside and outside the classroom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%