“…Analysis of the 1 H ( Table 1 and Figure S3 ) and 13 C NMR ( Table 2 and Figure S4 ) data of 1 revealed signals for a 4-methoxyphenethoxy group [δ H 2.85 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, H-β), 3.76 (3H, s, OMe-4′′), 4.12, 4.24 (each 1H, each dt, J = 10.5, 7.0 Hz, H-α), 6.85 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, H-3′′ and H-5′′), 7.15 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, H-2′′ and H-6′′); δ C 35.2 (C-β), 55.9 (OMe-4′′), 67.0 (C-α), 115.1 (C-3′′ and C-5′′), 131.2 (C-2′′ and C-6′′), 131.5 (C-1′′), 160.0 (C-4′′)], a secoiridoid moiety [δ H 1.62 (3H, dd, J = 7.0, 1.0 Hz, H-10), 2.44 (1H, dd, J = 14.0, 9.5 Hz, H-6), 2.69 (1H, dd, J = 14.0, 5.0 Hz, H-6), 3.71 (3H, s, OMe-11), 3.95 (1H, dd, J = 9.5, 5.0 Hz, H-5), 5.92 (1H, br s, H-1), 6.06 (1H, br q, J = 7.0 Hz, H-8), 7.51 (1H, s, H-3); δ C 13.7 (C-10), 32.0 (C-5), 41.3 (C-6), 52.1 ( C H 3 OCO-4), 95.3 (C-1), 109.5 (C-4), 125.1 (C-8), 130.5 (C-9), 155.3 (C-3), 168.9 (CH 3 O C O-4), 173.4 (C-7)], and a β-glucose moiety [δ H 3.28–3.36 (3H, m, H-2′, H-4′, and H-5′), 3.42 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 8.5 Hz, H-3′), 3.66 (1H, dd, J = 12.0, 5.5 Hz, H-6′), 3.88 (1H, dd, J = 12.0, 1.5 Hz, H-6′), 4.80 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′); δ C 62.9 (C-6′), 71.7 (C-4′), 74.9 (C-2′), 78.1 (C-3′), 78.6 (C-5′), 101.0 (C-1′)]. These data were nearly identical with those of (8 E )-ligstroside ( 5 ) [ 7 ], except that a methoxy group [δ H 3.76 (3H, s); δ C 55.9] at C-4′′ of 1 replaced the 4′′-hydroxy group of (8 E )-ligstroside ( 5 ) [ 7 ]. This was supported by NOESY correlations between OMe-4′′ (δ H 3.76) and H-3′′/H-5′′ (δ H 6.85) and by HMBC correlation between OMe-4′′ (δ H 3.76) and C-4′′ (δ C 160.0) ( Figure 2 ).…”