2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-012-9193-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Yield and Fuel Consumed for Domestic, Organic Waste Collections in Currently Operational Door-to-Door and Bring-Type Collection Systems

Abstract: The European Commission is tightening waste laws, and many local authorities, particularly in countries with low recycling rates, face the question of what system to introduce for the sourceseparate collection of food waste from householders. This study provides empirical data in form of fuel consumed and waste yield from four councils that already have source separate organic waste collections in operation. Two systems were compared: (i) door-to-door collection and (ii) bring systems where the householder wal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Martinho et al (2017) the collection truck takes less time to collect the waste (less stops and lower stopping time) and less workers are required, because they do not need to fetch the waste bags in every door. As for the downsides of this method: lower potential for source-separation (Laurieri et al 2020); higher contamination of organic waste than in the DtD method, which invalidates the use of digestate from anaerobic digestion as a natural fertilizer (Gredmaier et al 2013). The authors suggest this method when organic waste contamination is not a problem and householders are disciplined, as the fuel consumption is lower than DtD.…”
Section: Collection Types Transport and Fuel Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Martinho et al (2017) the collection truck takes less time to collect the waste (less stops and lower stopping time) and less workers are required, because they do not need to fetch the waste bags in every door. As for the downsides of this method: lower potential for source-separation (Laurieri et al 2020); higher contamination of organic waste than in the DtD method, which invalidates the use of digestate from anaerobic digestion as a natural fertilizer (Gredmaier et al 2013). The authors suggest this method when organic waste contamination is not a problem and householders are disciplined, as the fuel consumption is lower than DtD.…”
Section: Collection Types Transport and Fuel Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%