2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7714(02)00421-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variation of a molluscan assemblage living in a Caulerpa prolifera meadow within the inner Bay of Cádiz (SW Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 5 species (Pusillina marginata, Gibbula ardens, Rissoa similis, Bittium latreilii and Jujubinus striatus) occurring in the C. nodosa bed of Genoveses were also reported by Chemello et al (1997). Eight of the ten most dominant molluscs of the C. nodosa bed of Genoveses belong to the group of epifaunal species associated with vegetated bottoms; out of these, Smaragdia viridis and Rissoa membranacea are strictly associated with seagrasses (Rueda and Salas 2007;Rueda et al 2009a), and other species such as Rissoa monodonta, Jujubinus striatus, Gibbula leucophaea and Tricolia tenuis are generally found in macroalgae or seagrass beds in southern Spain (Rueda and Salas 2003;Rueda et al 2009a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only 5 species (Pusillina marginata, Gibbula ardens, Rissoa similis, Bittium latreilii and Jujubinus striatus) occurring in the C. nodosa bed of Genoveses were also reported by Chemello et al (1997). Eight of the ten most dominant molluscs of the C. nodosa bed of Genoveses belong to the group of epifaunal species associated with vegetated bottoms; out of these, Smaragdia viridis and Rissoa membranacea are strictly associated with seagrasses (Rueda and Salas 2007;Rueda et al 2009a), and other species such as Rissoa monodonta, Jujubinus striatus, Gibbula leucophaea and Tricolia tenuis are generally found in macroalgae or seagrass beds in southern Spain (Rueda and Salas 2003;Rueda et al 2009a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of the species with respect to their biogeographical distribution is problematic, due to the lack of consensus on geographical areas that have been established by different authors mainly on the basis of oceanographic characteristics (Ekman 1953;Briggs 1974;Longhurst 1998). In order to handle the geographical range in more detail, geographical areas were established on a finer scale as follows: (0) Alboran Sea, with all the species found in this study; (1) Mediterranean Sea beyond the Alboran Sea (ME); (2) Ibero-Moroccan Gulf (IM), including the southern coasts of Portugal and the Atlantic coasts of Andalusia (south-western Spain) and Morocco according to the faunistic lists given by Pallary (1920), Salas (1996), Rueda et al (2000Rueda et al ( , 2001, Rueda and Salas (2003), Gofas et al (2011) and to unpublished data of the Algarve 1988 expedition of the Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris; (3) western Europe (WE), from Portugal to the southern coasts of the United Kingdom according to the data given by Nobre (1940), Tebble (1966), Graham (1971), Bouchet et al (1979), Thompson and Brown (1976), Rolán (1983) and Rolán et al (1990); (4) northern Europe (NE), from the southern coasts of the United Kingdom to Scandinavia based on data by Høisaeter (1985) and Hansson (1998); (5) Canary Islands (CN), based on the works by Hernández et al (2011) and Gómez-Rodríguez and Pérez-Sánchez (1997); and (6) western Africa (AF), from Mauritania to tropical western African coasts according to the information given by Gofas and Zenetos (2003) on western African species that also occur in the Alboran Sea. The presence of the species in the different geographical areas was noted and their chorotypes were established.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Three replicates per station and month were generally taken, except in May and July 2009 at 10-15 m, with a total of 65 faunistic samples. This methodology has already been used successfully in studies of soft bottom molluscan assemblages (Rueda & Salas, 2003b;Urra et al, 2011). In the laboratory, faunistic samples were sieved over mesh sizes down to 0.5 mm, then stored in 70% ethanol.…”
Section: Faunistic Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dense population of R. splendida and B. reticulatum were presented in previous works (Öztürk, 2001;Albayrak et al, 2007;Çulha et al, 2007;Mutlu and Ergev, 2008;Bitlis et al, 2010;Çulha et al, 2010;Aslan-Cihangir and Ovalis 2013) carried out on the Turkish coasts. Rueda and Salas (2003) indicated that Jujubinus striatus (Di % = 30.15), Tricolia pullus (Di % = 14.41) and Nassarius incrassatus (Di % = 0.72) were dense in Caulerpa prolifera meadows. Yet, we noted that this species created a dense population on the soft bottoms as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%