2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variation in the metacommunity structure of benthic macroinvertebrates in a large river-connected floodplain lake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent studies on different study systems (e.g., rock pools, lakes, rivers, ponds, terrestrial systems) have attempted to apply these different archetypes to natural metacommunities (e.g., Bloch et al, 2007; Declerck et al, 2011; Dias et al, 2016; Kulkarni et al, 2019; Meynard et al, 2013), thereby contributing to our understanding of the underlying dynamics of metacommunities in terrestrial and aquatic systems. However, dynamics of a metacommunity system (and, in effect, assigned archetype) varied depending on the studied functional/ecological group (Pandit et al, 2009; Pineda et al, 2022; Tonkin et al, 2015), time scales (Castillo‐Escrivà et al, 2020; Li et al, 2022), geographic scale (Dümmer et al, 2016; Santos et al, 2016), and focal taxon (Tonkin et al, 2015). Any metacommunity is, to a varying degree, probably influenced by environmental filtering/niche selection, dispersal limitation, species interactions and stochastic drift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies on different study systems (e.g., rock pools, lakes, rivers, ponds, terrestrial systems) have attempted to apply these different archetypes to natural metacommunities (e.g., Bloch et al, 2007; Declerck et al, 2011; Dias et al, 2016; Kulkarni et al, 2019; Meynard et al, 2013), thereby contributing to our understanding of the underlying dynamics of metacommunities in terrestrial and aquatic systems. However, dynamics of a metacommunity system (and, in effect, assigned archetype) varied depending on the studied functional/ecological group (Pandit et al, 2009; Pineda et al, 2022; Tonkin et al, 2015), time scales (Castillo‐Escrivà et al, 2020; Li et al, 2022), geographic scale (Dümmer et al, 2016; Santos et al, 2016), and focal taxon (Tonkin et al, 2015). Any metacommunity is, to a varying degree, probably influenced by environmental filtering/niche selection, dispersal limitation, species interactions and stochastic drift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might explain why there was so much residual variance in our ordination‐based models. The finding of null models, however, is not consistent with the conclusion of most metacommunity studies conducted in aquatic ecosystems, suggesting that deterministic processes prevail in controlling ecological communities (e.g., Hill et al, 2019; Jamoneau et al, 2018; Li et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Throughout the year, seasons can alter habitat conditions in ways that increase habitat availability (e.g., resource pulses) or through imposing new environmental filters, and thus it is surprising that the temporal component of metacommunity dynamics is often neglected (Holyoak et al, 2020). Aquatic macroinvertebrate community structure can change seasonally due to variations in habitat condition, such as in a floodplain in China where environmental filtering effects became stronger over a season as habitats became more fragmented (Li et al, 2022). Land use can also have a seasonal effect on streams, and the influence of contaminants on water quality has been shown to be elevated during wetter periods (Shi et al, 2017; Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%