“…Subsequent studies on different study systems (e.g., rock pools, lakes, rivers, ponds, terrestrial systems) have attempted to apply these different archetypes to natural metacommunities (e.g., Bloch et al, 2007; Declerck et al, 2011; Dias et al, 2016; Kulkarni et al, 2019; Meynard et al, 2013), thereby contributing to our understanding of the underlying dynamics of metacommunities in terrestrial and aquatic systems. However, dynamics of a metacommunity system (and, in effect, assigned archetype) varied depending on the studied functional/ecological group (Pandit et al, 2009; Pineda et al, 2022; Tonkin et al, 2015), time scales (Castillo‐Escrivà et al, 2020; Li et al, 2022), geographic scale (Dümmer et al, 2016; Santos et al, 2016), and focal taxon (Tonkin et al, 2015). Any metacommunity is, to a varying degree, probably influenced by environmental filtering/niche selection, dispersal limitation, species interactions and stochastic drift.…”