1964
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0080029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Variation in Reproductive Traits of New Zealand White Rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

1966
1966
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sittman et al [7] have found a decrease in litter size from February through September indicating a relationship to the monthly temperature which, however, is constant in our airconditioned laboratories. …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Sittman et al [7] have found a decrease in litter size from February through September indicating a relationship to the monthly temperature which, however, is constant in our airconditioned laboratories. …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The low conception rate may also be a result of either fertilization failure or early embryonic mortality (Marai and El-Kelawy, 1999). However, Sittman et al (1964) showed that females refused mating most frequently in some seasons, but less frequently in other seasons. The same authors added that the conception rate from forced matings which were practised in such cases was, generally, low and inversely proportional to the seasonal frequency of this type of mating.…”
Section: Effect Of Kindling Seasonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several factors influence postweaning growth of rabbits. Climatic variations on a seasonal or shorter basis have been shown to have definite effects on doe productivity (Ross et al, 1961;Sittmann et al, 1964;McNitt and Moody, 19901, but few studies have been conducted in the United States of the effects of climate on fryer production. Rollins and Casady (19601, in California, found no effect of season on individual weaning weight at 56 d; however, season did affect total litter weight at 56 d (Casady et al, 1962).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%