2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variability of biomass, total leaf area and specific leaf area of forest understory herbs reflects their life strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also con rms Marshall's theory on clonal integration of ramets, which refers to the sharing of materials or resources between ramets: photosynthetic products are transported by rhizomes from the source -in this case from leaves of vegetative shoots, to the target -fruiting shoots (Marshall 1990). Similar results were found in a study on biomass and leaf traits of twelve understory herbaceous plants -in most cases, generative plants had lower speci c leaf area than vegetative plants (Jagodziński et al 2016). Contrary to results of Depauw et al (2020), we found greater plant height decreases under more closed canopy in recent than in ancient forests, however, this could be a species-speci c reaction to changes in light conditions.…”
Section: Differences In Aboveground Biomass Allocation As a Survival supporting
confidence: 86%
“…It also con rms Marshall's theory on clonal integration of ramets, which refers to the sharing of materials or resources between ramets: photosynthetic products are transported by rhizomes from the source -in this case from leaves of vegetative shoots, to the target -fruiting shoots (Marshall 1990). Similar results were found in a study on biomass and leaf traits of twelve understory herbaceous plants -in most cases, generative plants had lower speci c leaf area than vegetative plants (Jagodziński et al 2016). Contrary to results of Depauw et al (2020), we found greater plant height decreases under more closed canopy in recent than in ancient forests, however, this could be a species-speci c reaction to changes in light conditions.…”
Section: Differences In Aboveground Biomass Allocation As a Survival supporting
confidence: 86%
“…; Jagodziński et al . ). Thus, sampling a few individuals in a site at one point in time may lead to unrepresentative trait values poorly coupled to prevailing conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example Baroloto et al (2010) recommended sampling each species at least once in every plot. Even this level of effort may under-represent the variation that can occur in trait values between leaves on the same plant (Shipley 1995), between individuals of the same species (Albert et al 2010) and throughout the growing season (Pierce, Running & Walker 1994;Gunn et al 1999;Jagodzi nski et al 2016). Thus, sampling a few individuals in a site at one point in time may lead to unrepresentative trait values poorly coupled to prevailing conditions.…”
Section: F I E L D M E a S U R E M E N T S V S D A T A B A S E V A mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TB was used as an overall plant fitness measure reflecting space filled by the species, and is also claimed to be a good measure of plant fitness (Younginger et al 2017). We chose three leaf traits: SLA reflecting resource use efficiency within foliage (Wright et al 2004;Díaz et al 2016), PLA reflecting filling of space by foliage (Jagodziński et al 2016) and LAR as a measure of whole plant investment in foliage efficiency. These factors are known to vary across soil fertility and light availability gradients.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%