2009
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-7-45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal transmission potential and activity peaks of the new influenza A(H1N1): a Monte Carlo likelihood analysis based on human mobility

Abstract: Background: On 11 June the World Health Organization officially raised the phase of pandemic alert (with regard to the new H1N1 influenza strain) to level 6. As of 19 July, 137,232 cases of the H1N1 influenza strain have been officially confirmed in 142 different countries, and the pandemic unfolding in the Southern hemisphere is now under scrutiny to gain insights about the next winter wave in the Northern hemisphere. A major challenge is pre-empted by the need to estimate the transmission potential of the vi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
446
1
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(462 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
446
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that cities with different mobility patterns may also differ in the rate at which their inhabitants have infectious contact, leading to variation among cities in the risk of an epidemic [5][6][7]. Human movement patterns are heterogeneous at a wide range of scales-from within a building [8] to among countries [9][10][11], as evidenced by diverse sources of data, including the movements of mobile phone users [12,13], air travel patterns [9][10][11] and census data on commuting patterns [10,14,15]. At each scale, there appear collective mobility patterns maintained far from those predicted by homogeneous random movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that cities with different mobility patterns may also differ in the rate at which their inhabitants have infectious contact, leading to variation among cities in the risk of an epidemic [5][6][7]. Human movement patterns are heterogeneous at a wide range of scales-from within a building [8] to among countries [9][10][11], as evidenced by diverse sources of data, including the movements of mobile phone users [12,13], air travel patterns [9][10][11] and census data on commuting patterns [10,14,15]. At each scale, there appear collective mobility patterns maintained far from those predicted by homogeneous random movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual variation in rates of infectious contact can significantly alter patterns of disease spread [6,7,15,[19][20][21] and theoretical models of disease dynamics within and among cities (both individual-based simulations [5,7,10,15,[22][23][24] and metapopulation models [10,11,14,15,[25][26][27]) have shown that heterogeneous contact patterns are potentially important in determining urban epidemic dynamics. However, few studies have examined whether empirical variation in intracity mobility patterns is sufficient to drive detectable differences in epidemic dynamics among cities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PACS numbers: 89.75.Fb, 05.45.Df, 64.60.al Epidemic spreading is one of the most successful application areas of the new science of networks [1,2]. Indeed, the general acceptance within the scientific community that many diseases, like sexually transmitted diseases or the H1N1 virus, spread over networked systems represents a major step toward their understanding and control [3][4][5]. From a physics perspective, epidemic processes have been widely studied as a paradigm of nonequilibrium phase transitions with absorbing states [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimated 1·96 secondary cases were generated from each primary case early in New Zealand’s first pandemic wave (the reproduction estimate) 7 . Reproduction estimates in other countries range from 1·2 to 2·4, 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 and reached 2·8 for a subanalysis of persons under 20 years of age 10 . Certainly rapid transmission amongst students was commonly observed internationally 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%