2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-005-0869-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal pattern of denitrification under an irrigated wheat-maize cropping system fertilized with urea and farmyard manure in different combinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However a simulation was performed using the MOBILE-DNDC model (de Bruijn et al 2009) which estimated annual emissions by denitrification ranging between −3.3 and −7.3 kg N ha -1 y -1 on the given period. This estimate is coherent with existing data on agricultural crops (Barton et al 1999;Mahmood et al 2005;Mahmood et al 1998;Sanchez et al 2001). These relatively small emissions can also be explained by the relatively dry soil, especially during the spring when nitrogen was applied to the field (Fig.…”
Section: Other Nitrogen Fluxessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…However a simulation was performed using the MOBILE-DNDC model (de Bruijn et al 2009) which estimated annual emissions by denitrification ranging between −3.3 and −7.3 kg N ha -1 y -1 on the given period. This estimate is coherent with existing data on agricultural crops (Barton et al 1999;Mahmood et al 2005;Mahmood et al 1998;Sanchez et al 2001). These relatively small emissions can also be explained by the relatively dry soil, especially during the spring when nitrogen was applied to the field (Fig.…”
Section: Other Nitrogen Fluxessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This phenomenon is highly pronounced under heavy irrigation or excessive rainfall and especially on light textured soils. In some studies leaching losses were measured in clay type of soils (Mahmood et al, 2005). There is a greater potential for NO3 -leaching as it moves through the soil with diffusion and mass flow of water (Hermann et al, 2005).…”
Section: Nitrogen Losses Associated With Nitrification and Environmenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denitrification is usually based on the aerobic heterotrophic bacteria that have ability to reduce NO3 -in limited supply of oxygen (Mahmood et al, 2000;Mahmood et al, 2005) such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus nitrosus, Escherichia coli, and aspergillus flavus can reduce NO3 -to gaseous forms such as N2O, NO and elemental nitrogen (N2) into the atmosphere, under poor soil aeration (Di et al, 2002;Subbarao et al, 2006). Denitrification occurs when microbes convert ammonium to nitrate and use the nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor under saturated soil conditions.…”
Section: Denitrificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highestrates are often measured in spring and fall, which indicates that soil water status, is a strong controlling factor. Hence, floodirrigated cropping systems are especially prone to denitrification and recovery of fertilized nitrogen is often poor (Aulakh et al, 2001;Mahmood et al, 2000Mahmood et al, , 2005. To minimize the nitrogen losses, the feasible option is to focus on agricultural practices.…”
Section: Consequences Of Denitrification For Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fertilization can also affect the N 2 O to N 2 ratio from denitrification, and N 2 O emissions are most likely increasing due to an increased input of fertilization (Skiba and Smith, 2000). It has often been suggested that denitrification is limited under field conditions by NO3-availability (Bronson et al, 1992;Mahmood et al, 2005), which in turn is influenced by the fertilizer type and application rate together with timing and application method. For example, losses by denitrification are often highest shortly after fertilization application and these losses can account for 50-75% of the annual loss in afield (Ellis et al, 1998;Mogge et al, 1999).…”
Section: Presence Of Fertilizersmentioning
confidence: 99%