2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal movements of Gulf of Mexico sperm whales following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and the limitations of impact assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, we assumed no seasonal movement of populations and used an annual average density surface to estimate the number of animals exposed. While there is no definitive evidence of seasonal movement, there is, for example, evidence for seasonal fluctuations in passive acoustic detections of sperm whales at sites along the continental shelf (Morano et al 2020). If definitive information about seasonal movements were available, it could be incorporated into the model by using a seasonal density surface or adding an animal movement component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, we assumed no seasonal movement of populations and used an annual average density surface to estimate the number of animals exposed. While there is no definitive evidence of seasonal movement, there is, for example, evidence for seasonal fluctuations in passive acoustic detections of sperm whales at sites along the continental shelf (Morano et al 2020). If definitive information about seasonal movements were available, it could be incorporated into the model by using a seasonal density surface or adding an animal movement component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odontocetes possess biosonar and are likely capable of detecting oil slicks (Geraci et al, 1983), however there is no evidence of oil avoidance in coastal proxies (Smultea and Wursig, 1995). Similarly, oceanic cetaceans were observed, directly both visually and acoustically, within the DWH oil slick, with no evidence of avoidance or reduced presence (Hildebrand et al, 2015;Dias et al, 2017;Frasier et al, 2019;Morano et al, 2020). Initial acute exposure to surface oil through inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact for a portion of the major stocks is certain.…”
Section: Shallow-and Deep-diving Oceanic Cetaceansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photo courtesy of the US Navy abundance decline across all major invertebrate and fish deepwater taxa (Sutton et al 2020) that has coincided with the DWH spill and is coincident with the discovery of elevated PAH levels and other biochemical changes provides strong circumstantial evidence of a toxicological triggering event. Changes in the mesopelagic prey base were accompanied by shifts in the distribution of major marine mammal predators, including whales and dolphins (Fraiser, 2020;Fraiser et al, 2020), although seasonal movements in species such as sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) were apparent (Morano et al, 2020). While direct oil contamination may have elicited many of the toxicological impacts seen in other species, disruption of chemosensory abilities may be particularly important as an outcome for deep-sea biota.…”
Section: Monitoring Toxicological Impacts In the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%