2004
DOI: 10.1894/0038-4909(2004)049<0501:sfubdm>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Forage Use by Desert Mule Deer in Southeastern California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…relatively few species), they have many plant species with varying properties as deer forage that respond in different ways to changes in environmental conditions. For example, fairy-duster (Calliandra eriophylla) produces leaves only in wet seasons, during which times they are frequently used by mule deer (Marshal et al, 2004). Other browse species (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…relatively few species), they have many plant species with varying properties as deer forage that respond in different ways to changes in environmental conditions. For example, fairy-duster (Calliandra eriophylla) produces leaves only in wet seasons, during which times they are frequently used by mule deer (Marshal et al, 2004). Other browse species (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mule deer occurred at low density in the study area (0.05-0.13 deer/km 2 ; Thompson and Bleich, 1993;Marshal et al, 2006b). An aerial survey of feral asses produced an estimate of 0.38/km 2 (Bureau of Land Management), and density of bighorn sheep was estimated at 0.38/km 2 (California Department of Fish and Game).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Because of the puna region presents a marked seasonality in precipitation which affects the soil conditions and the grasslands composition (San Martin 1996;Marshal et al 2004;Ezcurra et al 2006), soil and vegetation samplings were carried out in the two seasons (wet and dry), particularly in February (2005) and June (2006) corresponding to the wet and dry seasons, respectively. The samplings were carried out under a mean temperature of 6ºC in February and 2.9ºC in June.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%