“…Although some researchers studying popular culture (see Crowley & Rasmussen, 2010; Grummell, 2010; Sandlin, 2010; Tisdell, 2008; Wright, 2007) have collected compelling accounts of how individuals receive and utilize public pedagogies, this practice has not been widely applied to the majority of other informal sites of learning identified in the literature. Although these critiques have previously been leveled at H. A. Giroux’s body of work (see C. G. Robbins, 2009), other authors such as Ellsworth (2005) and Lacy (1995) also limit their analyses of public spaces of learning to the perspective of the researcher or the site itself. In calling for researchers to explore more fully the pedagogical processes of public pedagogy, we are not calling for public pedagogy research that utilizes empirical data as proof toward positivistic truth claims; rather, we argue for research that articulates a multitude of interpretations and that draws on psychoanalytical, phenomenological, existential, and poststructural understandings of learning to develop an empiricism that honors the complexity and ambiguity inherent in the mechanisms and processes of public pedagogy.…”