2019
DOI: 10.1177/2058738419855226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for highly sensitive and specific biomarkers for sepsis: State-of-the-art in post-mortem diagnosis of sepsis through immunohistochemical analysis

Abstract: The autoptical observations commonly ascribed to sepsis deal with unspecific general and local signs of inflammation or ischemia, such as myocardial inflammation, pulmonary edema and infiltration, cerebral swallowing, and tubular necrosis in the kidney. In the two last decades, some studies have been carried out to implement immunohistochemical markers for post-mortem diagnosis. All of these target molecules are specifically up-regulated or down-regulated during systemic inflammatory responses, especially for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several immunohistochemical markers to date were tested as possible post-mortem markers for the diagnosis of sepsis [ 3 , 4 , 12 , 14 , 21 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. The lung, representing the mostly impaired organ in sepsis, has rapidly become the main target for immunohistochemical assays in order not only to improve the knowledge of sepsis pathophysiology, but also to establish whether an immunohistochemical marker exists, specific enough to allow a differential diagnosis between sepsis and non-sepsis fatalities within a medico-legal context [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ] ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several immunohistochemical markers to date were tested as possible post-mortem markers for the diagnosis of sepsis [ 3 , 4 , 12 , 14 , 21 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. The lung, representing the mostly impaired organ in sepsis, has rapidly become the main target for immunohistochemical assays in order not only to improve the knowledge of sepsis pathophysiology, but also to establish whether an immunohistochemical marker exists, specific enough to allow a differential diagnosis between sepsis and non-sepsis fatalities within a medico-legal context [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ] ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34]. Also, neutrophils granule contains enzyme-like lysozyme or lactoferrin which can be markers of organ-specific inflammation [35]. However, only limited studies described NLR association in MS diseases [36,37] and it is still a growing interest aiming to establish potential serological markers associated with a local and systemic inflammatory status that are cost-effective and minimally invasive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the assessment of a causal correlation between the traumatic event and the meningeal infection, this may result to be extremely complex. In fact, as described in the scientific literature, the time-lapse between trauma and clinical signs of infectious disease result can be extremely variable, from a minimum of a few hours to a maximum time of several years [96][97][98][99].…”
Section: Forensic Pathology Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible to perform immunohistochemical studies for the post-mortem diagnosis of sepsis related to meningitis [97,98]. For the pathologist, the historical immunohistochemical markers used (β-APP, GFAP) will continue to play an important role in the diagnostic evaluation process; the best understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of the resulting damage to a TBI, however, as well as the understanding of oxidative stress leading to apoptosis, will assume greater importance, as the potential to allow for a more precise diagnosis in time compared with classic markers (Figure 6).…”
Section: Forensic Pathology Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%