2020
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10100849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Mortem Investigations for the Diagnosis of Sepsis: A Review of Literature

Abstract: To date, sepsis is still one of the most important causes of death due to the difficulties concerning the achievement of a correct diagnosis. As well as in a clinical context, also in a medico-legal setting the diagnosis of sepsis can reveal challenging due to the unspecificity of the signs detected during autopsies, especially when no ante-mortem clinical data, laboratory, and cultural results are available. Thus, a systematic review of literature was performed to provide an overview of the main available and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negativity reported in some cases could be explained by: 1) the early “window” period in which RT-PCR cannot detect the RNA; 2) the different clinical and biological evolution of the infection in the late phase resulting in subjects both negative or continuously positive; 3) the immune interindividual variability and the different virus haplotype ( Sessa F. et al, 2020 ; Carter et al, 2020 ; Kucirka et al, 2020 ; Lescure et al, 2020 ; Norsa et al, 2020 ; Shen et al, 2020 ; Yi, 2020 ). Other factors affecting the RT-PCR results can be the sampling technique and post-mortem tissue degradation ( Ventura Spagnolo et al, 2019b ; Stassi et al, 2020 ; Youd and Moore, 2020 ). Moreover, this investigation was performed on other organs, resulting in positivity in the heart, liver, spleen, kidney, and testis of few cases ( Wichmann et al, 2020 ; Bradley et al, 2020 ; Sekulic et al, 2020 ; Menter et al, 2020 ; Hanley et al, 2020b ; Tian et al, 2020b ; Lindner et al, 2020 ; Iuga et al, 2020 ], supporting that the SARS-CoV-2 might determine a direct effect not only on respiratory tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negativity reported in some cases could be explained by: 1) the early “window” period in which RT-PCR cannot detect the RNA; 2) the different clinical and biological evolution of the infection in the late phase resulting in subjects both negative or continuously positive; 3) the immune interindividual variability and the different virus haplotype ( Sessa F. et al, 2020 ; Carter et al, 2020 ; Kucirka et al, 2020 ; Lescure et al, 2020 ; Norsa et al, 2020 ; Shen et al, 2020 ; Yi, 2020 ). Other factors affecting the RT-PCR results can be the sampling technique and post-mortem tissue degradation ( Ventura Spagnolo et al, 2019b ; Stassi et al, 2020 ; Youd and Moore, 2020 ). Moreover, this investigation was performed on other organs, resulting in positivity in the heart, liver, spleen, kidney, and testis of few cases ( Wichmann et al, 2020 ; Bradley et al, 2020 ; Sekulic et al, 2020 ; Menter et al, 2020 ; Hanley et al, 2020b ; Tian et al, 2020b ; Lindner et al, 2020 ; Iuga et al, 2020 ], supporting that the SARS-CoV-2 might determine a direct effect not only on respiratory tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological features observed at autopsy in septic deaths are discussed and listed in two recent publications. 25 , 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of this, an accurate comprehension of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the evolution of COVID-19 disease, especially in critical patients, is of utmost importance in order to find effective treatment strategies. To this end, a multidisciplinary approach is needed, comprehensive of clinical, biochemical, radiologic, biomolecular, and forensic investigations, each representing a piece of the whole puzzle [ 50 , 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%