2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00307.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching behaviour of an omnivorous predator for novel and native host plants of its herbivores: a study on arthropod colonization of eucalyptus in Brazil

Abstract: Adaptation to novel host plants is a much-studied process in arthropod herbivores, but not in their predators. This is surprising, considering the attention that has been given to the role of predators in host range expansion in herbivores; the enemy-free space hypothesis suggests that plants may be included in the host range of herbivores because of lower predation and parasitism rates on the novel host plants. This effect can only be important if natural enemies do not follow their prey to the novel host pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the shift by the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella, from hawthorn to apple affords escape from parasitoids because the size of apples lets flies feed far deeper inside fruits than parasitoid ovipositors can reach (Feder 1995; see also Gruenhagen and Perring 2001;Oppenheim and Gould 2002). In contrast, if a novel host offers EFS only because it is novel and there is a lag in the evolution of parasitoid or predator searching behavior, then EFS might represent only a transitory phase in host shifting (Grosman et al 2005). Such transitory EFS might not Nason et al (2002) be easily detectable, but could still be critical to host shifting and the rapid evolution of distinct, genetically isolated host forms.…”
Section: Acer Negundo Salix Nigramentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, the shift by the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella, from hawthorn to apple affords escape from parasitoids because the size of apples lets flies feed far deeper inside fruits than parasitoid ovipositors can reach (Feder 1995; see also Gruenhagen and Perring 2001;Oppenheim and Gould 2002). In contrast, if a novel host offers EFS only because it is novel and there is a lag in the evolution of parasitoid or predator searching behavior, then EFS might represent only a transitory phase in host shifting (Grosman et al 2005). Such transitory EFS might not Nason et al (2002) be easily detectable, but could still be critical to host shifting and the rapid evolution of distinct, genetically isolated host forms.…”
Section: Acer Negundo Salix Nigramentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Interestingly, the acquisition of "enemy-freespace" has been proposed as trade-off for reduced larval performance on non-natal host plants since parasitism is initially lower after establishment on a new plant (Mira & Bernays 2002;Murphy 2004;Grosman et al 2005). However, once the parasitoids incorporate a novel plant into their search image parasitism rates will increase (reviewed by Ishii & Shimada 2010); and, if the development times of the gall midge are asynchronous (as is the case in this system), cascading HAD of populations of both the midge and its parasitoids may develop in sympatry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, this is one possible cause for the lower survival of this predator on eucalyptus, which has been considered as due to phytophagy compared with guava. P. nigrispinus showed lower colonization of P. nigrispinus fed on Thyrinteina arnobia reared with eucalyptus than guava, which was attributed to qualitative differences of prey in two host plants, possibly due to toxic compounds in eucalyptus that could be sequestered by their prey and affect the third trophic level (Grosman et al 2005). Chemical defense of plants generally has a negative impact on the characteristics of natural enemies, such as growth, development, survival and morphology of predators and parasitoids (De Clercq et al 2000;Havill and Raffa 2000;Ode et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%