Insecticide impact on non-target species, such as insect predators and parasitoids, is an ever-growing concern in agriculture and recent studies have been shifting focus from lethal to sub-lethal effects since they may prevail in field conditions, although more difficult to assess. Synthetic insecticides are the main concern, but the recent spread of biopesticide use in agriculture draws attention, particularly the main botanical insecticide currently in use - azadirachtin. Here we assessed the lethal and behavioral sub-lethal response of predatory larvae of the lacewing species Chrysoperla externa and Ceraeochrysa cubana to two frequently used synthetic insecticides, malathion and permethrin, and to the bioinsecticide azadirachtin. The recommended field concentration of the synthetic insecticides led to low survival time of lacewing larvae from both species, in contrast with azadirachtin. However, all three compounds led to 100% mortality of the lacewing larvae from both species. Insecticide repellence (i.e., avoidance without contact) was similar for both synthetic insecticides in both species, but azadirachtin was a stronger repellent for C. externa, but not C. cubana. In addition, insecticide irritability (i.e., avoidance after contact) occurred in both lacewing species to all three insecticides tested. The notion that natural compounds are safer than synthetic compounds to non-target species is refuted in the present study, which also detected significant irritability to all of the insecticides regardless of their origin, and species-specific repellence elicited particularly by azadirachtin. Therefore, bioinsecticides should not be exempted from risk assessment, and non-target sub-lethal effects should not be neglected when considering potential insecticide use in agriculture.
In theory, selection favours predators that select prey in order to maximise reproductive success. We studied the association between preference and performance of the generalist predator Orius laevigatus with respect to two prey species: spider mites (Tetranychus urticae) and western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis). Under ample prey supply, the predators had higher maximum reproductive success (measured as intrinsic population growth rate r) on thrips than on spider mites; hence thrips represent a higher prey quality to the bugs. This was at odds with the observed preference of the predatory bug for plants (patches) with high densities of spider mites to plants with moderate densities of thrips in release‐recapture experiments. Thus, prey quality does not suffice to explain the preference of predators for plants with prey. The quality of a patch as an oviposition site (i.e. the number of eggs produced on a patch per bug per day) also did not match preference patterns. Hence, patch preference was not correlated to prey quality or oviposition rate on prey patches. However, patch productivity, i.e. the total number of offspring surviving until adulthood that can be produced by one female on a patch, was correlated with preference. This was further tested by offering the predators a choice between plants with high densities of spider mites and plants with high densities of thrips in an independent set of release‐recapture experiments. These two types of prey patches were found equivalent in terms of patch productivity. Indeed, the predators showed no preference for either of the two types of patches, which is in agreement with our predictions. This suggests that the predatory bugs select patches based on patch productivity rather than on prey quality or oviposition rate on a patch.
The occurrence and strength of interactions among natural enemies and herbivores depend on their foraging decisions, and several of these decisions are based on odours. To investigate interactions among arthropods in a greenhouse cropping system, we studied the behavioural response of the predatory bug Orius laevigatus (Fieber) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) towards cucumber plants infested either with thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)) or with spider mites (Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)). In greenhouse release‐recapture experiments, the predatory bug showed a significant preference for both thrips‐infested plants and spider mite‐infested plants over clean plants. Predatory bugs preferred plants infested with spider mites to plants with thrips. Experience with spider mites on cucumber leaves prior to their release in the greenhouse had no effect on the preference of the predatory bugs. However, this experience did increase the percentage of predators recaptured. Y‐tube olfactometer experiments showed that O. laevigatus was more attracted to odours from plants infested with spider mites than to odours from clean plants. Thus, O. laevigatus is able to perceive odours and may use them to find plants with prey in more natural conditions. The consequences of the searching behaviour for pest control are discussed.
Many omnivorous arthropods are important natural enemies because they can feed on plantprovided pollen and several prey species, and thus persist in crops even in the absence of the target pest. Hence, populations of these predators can be established in a crop by providing alternative food, thus increasing biological control. We investigated how alternative food affects broad mite (Polyphagotarsonemus latus) control on chilli pepper plants by predatory mites. The predatory mite Amblyseius herbicolus had high oviposition and population growth rates when fed with cattail pollen, chilli pepper pollen and bee-collected pollen, and a low rate on the alternative prey Tetranychus urticae. Supplementing pepper plants with pollen resulted in better control of broad mite populations. Release of A. herbicolus on young plants with weekly addition of honeybee pollen until plants produce flowers seems a viable strategy to sustain populations of this predator, thus protecting young, vulnerable plants from broad mite infestations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.