I6we use fK/fn. =1.28, fn =0.95rn,, and sinB=0.22. The range quoted in the result (19) corresponds to 0 2 6 2 -i . There a r e some papers which suggest 6 = 0. See, for instance, J. Schwinger, Phys, Letters E , 473 (1967): Riazuddin and Fayyazuddin, Nuovo Cimento 45, 520 (1968); V. S. Mathur and R . N. hlohapatra, Phys.Rev. 173, 1668 (1968).':obtained from the experimental value of the rate. "J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. 156, 1508(1967.Two alternatives to reconcile the present disagreement between experiment and the "simple" unitarity bound in K ! -p+p-a r e considered. These alternatives presume that C P violation does not play the dominant role (via Ret) in the resolution of this puzzle. They a r e (1) the introduction of new muonic interactions, and (2) the existence of a new pseudoscalar meson. The first alternative can already be eliminated by present experimental evidence. The second alternative must satisfy a number of restrictions.Recently, the r e s u l t of a n e x p e r i m e n t a l s e a r c h f o r the d e c a y w a s r e p o r t e d by C l a r k ct al.' They o b s e r v e d n o c l e a r evidence f o r r e a c t i o n ( I ) , and s e t a n u p p e r bound to t h i s branching r a t i o . I t is