2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.79.051101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for the decayB+Ks0Ks0π+

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(12 reference statements)
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, this process has not yet been observed and the current upper limit on the branching ratio is reported as B(B → µν µ ) exp. < 1 × 10 −6 at 90% CL [32][33][34]. This result may be compared with the SM prediction B(B → µν µ ) SM = (0.41 ± 0.05) × 10 −6 and thus, we expect that B → µν µ will be observed with a meaningful statistical significance at SuperKEKB/Belle II.…”
Section: Future Prospectsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, this process has not yet been observed and the current upper limit on the branching ratio is reported as B(B → µν µ ) exp. < 1 × 10 −6 at 90% CL [32][33][34]. This result may be compared with the SM prediction B(B → µν µ ) SM = (0.41 ± 0.05) × 10 −6 and thus, we expect that B → µν µ will be observed with a meaningful statistical significance at SuperKEKB/Belle II.…”
Section: Future Prospectsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…As for the V 2 scenario, R π and R ps are complementary because the signs of the new physics contributions relative to the SM ones are opposite in these observables as seen in Eqs. (12), (13) and (34). The S 1 and S 2 scenarios are constrained more tightly by R ps because of the chiral enhancement of the pseudoscalar contribution in the purely leptonic decay.…”
Section: Present Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixing angle is obtained as ω = −0.10 ± 0.03 ± 0.02 ± 0.02 rad, which means the S and D waves are dominant for D 1 (2420) and D 1 (2430), respectively. BaBar also did the Dalitz analysis for B − → D ( * )0 [22] with a data sample around six times higher than Belle's analysis [21], confirming the existence of D * 0 (2400) 0 with a mass and width of 2297 ± 8 ± 20 MeV/c 2 and 273 ± 12 ± 48 MeV, respectively. These values are consistent with Belle's result with better precision.…”
Section: Studies From B Decaysmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The observation of the decay mode J/ψπ 0 π 0 [22] established that it has zero isospin. However it is not observed to decay to D * D * [23], nor to D * sD * s [24], so that its properties do not lend themselves to a simple charmonium interpretation, and its nature is still unclear. A subsequent Belle analysis [25] of the same final state suggested also the existence of an additional resonance around 4.1 GeV/c 2 that they dubbed the Y(4008).…”
Section: Study Of the J/ψω In Two-photon Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This claim generated a great deal of interest [15], [16] since such states must have a minimum quark content ccdu, and thus would represent an unequivocal manifestation of four-quark meson state. The BABAR collaboration searched the Z(4430) + in a similar analysis of the Belle collaboration in the process B → ψ(2S)Kπ and also in B → J/ψKπ[17] but they did not find any structure neither in the J/ψπ nor in the ψ(2S)π. Recently Belle performed an amplitude analysis of the J/ψKπ[18] system finding no significant evidence of the Z(4430) + in agreement with BABAR .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%