Search for Resonant Diphoton Production with the D0 Detector

Abazov, V. M.; Abbott, B.; Abolins, M.; Acharya, B. S.; Adams, M. R.; Adams, T.; Aguiló, E.; Ahsan, M.; Alexeev, G. D.; Alkhazov, G.; Alton, A.; Alverson, G.; Alves, G. A.; Anastasoaie, M.; Ancu, L. S.; Andeen, T.; Andrieu, Bernard; Anzelc, M. S.; Aoki, M.; Arnoud, Y.; Arov, M.; Arthaud, M.; Askew, A.; Åsman, B.; Jesus, A. C.S. Assis; Atramentov, O.; Ávila, C.; Backusmayes, J.; Badaud, F.; Bagby, L.; Baldin, B.; Bandurin, D. V.; Banerjee, P.; Banerjee, S.; Barberis, E.; Barfuss, A. F.; Bargassa, P.; Baringer, P.; Barreto, J.; Bartlett, J. F.; Bassler, U.; Bauer, D.; Beale, S.; Bean, A.; Begalli, M.; Begel, M.; Bélanger-Champagne, C.; Bellantoni, L.; Bellavance, A.; Benitez, J. A.; Beri, S. B.; Bernardi, G.; Bernhard, R.; Bertram, I.; Besançon, M.; Beuselinck, R.; Bezzubov, V. A.; Bhat, P. C.; Bhatnagar, V.; Blazey, G.; Blekman, F.; Blessing, S.; Bloom, K.; Boehnlein, A.; Boline, D.; Bolton, T.; Boos, E.; Borissov, G.; Bose, T.; Brandt, A.; Brock, R.; Brooijmans, G.; Bross, A.; Brown, D.; Bu, X. B.; Buchanan, N. J.; Buchholz, D.; Buehler, M.; Buescher, V.; Bunichev, V.; Burdin, S.; Burnett, T. H.; Buszello, C. P.; Calfayan, P.; Calpas, B.; Calvet, S.; Cammin, J.; Carrasco-Lizarraga, M. A.; Carrera, E.; Carvalho, W.; Casey, B. C.K.; Castilla‐Valdez, H.; Chakrabarti, S.; Chakraborty, D.; Chan, K. M.; Chandra, A.; Cheu, E.; Cho, D. K.; Choi, S.; Choudhary, B. C.; Christofek, L.; Christoudias, T.; Cihangir, S.; Claes, D. R.; Clutter, J.; Cooke, M.; Cooper, W. E.; Corcoran, M.; Couderc, F.; Cousinou, M. C.; Cŕéṕe-Renaudin, S.; Cuplov, V.; Ćutts, D.; Ćwiok, M.; Motta, H. da; Das, A.; Davies, G.; De, K.; Jong, S. J. De; Cruz-Burelo, E. De La; Martins, C. De Oliveira; Devaughan, K.; Déliot, F.; Demarteau, M.; Démina, R.; Denisov, D.; Denisov, S. P.; Desai, S.; Diehl, H. T.; Diesburg, M.; Dominguez, A.; Dorland, T.; Dubey, A.; Dudko, L.; Duflot, L.; Dugad, S.; Duggan, D.; Duperrin, A.; Dutt, S.; Dyer, J.; Dyshkant, A.; Eads, M.; Edmunds, D.; Ellison, J.; Elvira, V. D.; Enari, Y.; Eno, S. C.; Ermolov, P.; Escalier, M.; Evans, H.; Evdokimov, A.; Евдокимов, В. Н.; Ferapontov, A.; Ferbel, T.; Fiedler, F.; Filthaut, F.; Fisher, W. C.; Fisk, H. E.; Fortner, M.; Fox, H.; Fu, S.; Fuess, S.; Gadfort, T.; Galea, C.; Garćıa, C.; García-Bellido, A.; Gavrilov, V.; Geist, W.; Geng, W.; Gerber, C. E.; Gershtein, Y.; Gillberg, D.; Ginther, G.; Gómez, B.; Goussiou, A. G.; Grannis, P. D.; Greenlee, H.; Greenwood, Z. D.; Gregores, E. M.; Grenier, G.; Gris, Ph.; Grivaz, J.-F.; Grohsjean, A.; Grünendahl, S.; Grünewald, M.; Guo, F.; Guo, J.; Gutiérrez, G.; Gutiérrez, P.; Haas, A.; Hadley, N. J.; Haefner, P.; Hagopian, S.; Haley, J.; Hall, I.; Hall, R. E.; Liu, Han; Harder, K.; Harel, A.; Hauptman, J. M.; Hays, J.; Hebbeker, T.; Hedin, D.; Hegeman, J.; Heinson, A. P.; Heintz, U.; Hensel, C.; Herner, K.; Hesketh, G. G.; Hildreth, M.; Hirosky, R.; Hoang, T.; Hobbs, J.; Hoeneisen, B.; Hohlfeld, M.; Hossain, S.; Houben, P.; Hu, Y.; Hubáček, Z.; Huske, N.; Hynek, V.; Iashvili, I.; Illingworth, R.; Ito, A. S.; Jabeen, S.; Jaffré, M.; Jain, Sandhya; Jakobs, K.; Jarvis, C.; Jesik, R.; Johns, K. A.; Johnson, C. A.; Johnson, M.; Johnston, D.; Jonckheere, A.; Jönsson, P.; Rozas, A. Juste; Kajfasz, E.; Karmanov, D.; Kasper, P. A.; Katsanos, I.; Kaushik, V.; Kehoe, R.; Kermiche, S.; Khalatyan, N.; Khanov, A.; Kharchilava, A.; Kharzheev, Y. N.; Khatidze, D.; Kim, T. J.; Kirby, M.; Kirsch, Matthias; Klima, B.; Kohli, J. M.; Konrath, J. P.; Kozelov, A. V.; Kraus, J.; Kühl, T.; Kumar, Arun; Kupčo, A.; Kurča, T.; Kuzmin, V. A.; Kvita, J.; Lacroix, F.; Lam, D.; Lammers, S.; Landsberg, G.; Lebrun, P.; Lee, W. M.; Leflat, A.; Lellouch, J.; Li, J.; Li, L.; Li, Q. Z.; Lietti, S. M.; Lim, Jaehoon; Lima, J. G.R.; Lincoln, D.; Linnemann, J.; Lipaev, V. V.; Lipton, R.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Lobodenko, A.; Lokajı́ček, M.; Love, P. A.; Lubatti, H. J.; Luna-García, R.; Lyon, A. L.; Maciel, A. K.A.; Mackin, D.; Madaras, R. J.; Mättig, P.; Magerkurth, A.; Mal, P.; Malbouisson, H.; Malik, S.; Malyshev, V. L.; Maravin, Y.; Martin, B.; McCarthy, R. L.; Meijer, M. M.; Melnitchouk, A.; Mendoza, L.; Mercadante, P. G.; Merkin, M.; Merritt, K. W.; Meyer, A.; Meyer, J.; Mitrevski, J.; Mommsen, R. K.; Mondal, N. K.; Moore, R. W.; Moulik, T.; Muanza, G. S.; Mulhearn, M.; Mundal, O.; Mundim, L.; Nagy, E.; Naimuddin, M.; Narain, M.; Neal, H. A.; Negret, J. P.; Neustroev, P.; Nilsen, H.; Nogima, H.; Novaes, S. F.; Nunnemann, T.; O’Neil, D. C.; Obrant, G.; Ochando, C.; Onoprienko, D.; Oshima, N.; Osman, N.; Osta, J.; Otec, R.; Garzón, G. J. Otero Y; Owen, M.; Padilla, M.; Padley, P.; Pangilinan, M.; Parashar, N.; Park, S. J.; Park, S. K.; Parsons, J. A.; Partridge, R.; Parua, N.; Patwa, A.; Pawloski, G.; Penning, B.; Perfilov, M.; Peters, K.; Peters, Y.; Pétroff, P.; Petteni, M.; Piegaia, R.; Piper, J.; Pleier, M. A.; Podesta-Lerma, P. L.M.; Podstavkov, V. M.; Pogorelov, Y.; Pol, M. E.; Polozov, P.; Pope, B. G.; Popov, A.; Potter, C. T.; Silva, W. L. Prado Da; Prosper, H.; Protopopescu, S.; Qian, J.; Quadt, A.; Quinn, B.; Rakitine, A.; Rangel, M. S.; Ranjan, K.; Ratoff, P. N.; Renkel, P.; Rich, P.; Rijssenbeek, M.; Ripp-Baudot, I.; Rizatdinova, F.; Robinson, S.; Rodrigues, R. F.; Rominsky, M.; Royon, C.; Rubinov, P.; Ruchti, R.; Safronov, G.; Sajot, G.; Sánchez-Hernández, A.; Sanders, M. P.; Sanghi, B.; Savage, G.; Sawyer, L.; Scanlon, T.; Schaile, D.; Schamberger, R. D.; Scheglov, Y.; Schellman, H.; Schliephake, T.; Schlobohm, S.; Schwanenberger, C.; Schwienhorst, R.; Sekaric, J.; Severini, H.; Shabalina, E.; Shamim, M.; Shary, V.; Shchukin, A. A.; Shivpuri, R. K.; Siccardi, V.; Šimák, V.; Sirotenko, V.; Skubic, P.; Slattery, P.; Smirnov, D.; Snow, G. R.; Snow, J.; Snyder, S.; Söldner-Rembold, S.; Sonnenschein, L.; Sopczak, A.; Sosebee, M.; Soustružnı́k, K.; Spurlock, B.; Stark, J.; Stolin, V.; Stoyanova, D. A.; Strandberg, J.; Strandberg, S.; Strang, M.; Strauss, E.; Strauss, M.; Ströhmer, R.; Strom, D.; Stutte, L.; Sumowidagdo, S.; Svoisky, P.; Sznajder, A.; Tanasijczuk, A. J.; Taylor, W.; Tiller, B.; Tissandier, F.; Titov, M.; Tokmenin, V. V.; Torchiani, I.; Tsybychev, D.; Tuchming, B.; Tully, C.; Tuts, P. M.; Unalan, R.; Uvarov, L.; Uvarov, S.; Uzunyan, S.; Vachon, B.; Berg, P. J. Van Den; Kooten, R. Van; Leeuwen, W. M. Van; Varelas, N.; Varnes, E. W.; Vasilyev, I. A.; Verdier, P.; Vertogradov, L. S.; Verzocchi, M.; Vilanova, D.; Villeneuve-Seguier, F.; Vint, P.; Vokáč, P.; Voutilainen, M.; Wagner, R. L.; Wahl, H. D.; Wang, Michael; Warchol, J.; Watts, G.; Wayne, M.; Weber, G.; Weber, M.; Welty-Rieger, L.; Wenger, Andreas; Wermes, N.; Wetstein, M.; White, A.; Wicke, D.; Williams, Mark Richard James; Wilson, G. W.; Wimpenny, S.; Wobisch, M.; Wood, D.; Wyatt, T. R.; Xie, Y.; Xu, C.; Yacoob, S.; Yamada, R.; Yang, W. C.; Yasuda, T.; Yatsunenko, Y. A.; Ye, Z.; Yin, H.; Yip, K.; Yoo, H. D.; Youn, S. W.; Yu, J.; Zeitnitz, C.; Zelitch, S.; Zhao, T.; Zhou, B.; Zhu, J.; Zieliński, M.; Ziemińska, D.; Živković, L.; Zutshi, V.; Zverev, E. G.

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.231801

Cited by 143 publications

(236 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

228

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As discussed earlier, the BRs of H ± depend on the relative values of |X|, |Y | and |Z|. The search by the D0 collaboration in [34] with 1 fb −1 of data obtained the following limit in the region 80 GeV ≤ m H ± ≤ 90 GeV:…”

Section: A Tevatron Searchesmentioning

confidence: 88%

Light charged Higgs boson with dominant decay to quarks and its search at the LHC and future colliders

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The possibility of a light charged Higgs boson H ± that decays predominantly to quarks (cs and/or cb) and with a mass in the range 80 GeV ≤ m H ± ≤ 90 GeV is studied in the context of Three-Higgs-Doublet Models (3HDMs). At present the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has little sensitivity to this scenario, and currently the best constraints are from LEP2 and Tevatron searches. The branching ratio of H ± → cb can be dominant in two of the five types of 3HDM, and we determine the parameter space where this occurs. The decay H ± → cb has recently been searched for at the LHC for the first time, and with increased integrated luminosity one would expect sensitivity to the region 80 GeV ≤ m H ± ≤ 90 GeV due to the smaller backgrounds with respect to H ± → cs decays. * Electronic address: a.g.akeroyd@soton.ac.uk † Electronic address: S.Moretti@soton.ac.uk ‡ Electronic address: ms32g13@soton.ac.uk arXiv:1810.05403v1 [hep-ph]

show abstract

Section: A Tevatron Searchesmentioning

confidence: 88%

Light charged Higgs boson with dominant decay to quarks and its search at the LHC and future colliders

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• NMSSMTools applies limits on the NMSSM Higgs sector originating in direct searches at LEP [80,81], the TeVatron [82][83][84] or the LHC. In the latter case, the properties of the observed Higgs state are tested in a global fit [85] while several constraints from unsuccessful searches [86-95] -in particular searches for Higgs-to-Higgs decays involving a light singlet state -are also considered.…”

Section: Phenomenological Limits On the Scanmentioning

confidence: 99%

Confronting the neutralino and chargino sector of the NMSSM with the multilepton searches at the LHC

Domingo

Kim

Lozano³

et al. 2020

Phys. Rev. D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We test the impact of the ATLAS and CMS multi-lepton searches performed at the LHC with 8 as well as 13 TeV center-of-mass energy (using only the pre-2018 results) on the chargino and neutralino sector of the NMSSM. Our purpose consists in analyzing the actual reach of these searches for a full model and in emphasizing effects beyond the MSSM that affect the performance of current (MSSMinspired) electroweakino searches. To this end, we consider several scenarios characterizing specific features of the NMSSM electroweakino sector. We then perform a detailed collider study, generating Monte-Carlo events through Pythia and testing against current LHC constraints implemented in the public tool CheckMATE. We find e.g. that SUSY decay chains involving intermediate singlino or Higgs-singlet states can modify the naive MSSM-like picture of the constraints by inducing finalstates with softer or less-easily identifiable SM particles -reversely, a compressed configuration with singlino NLSP occasionally induces final states that are rich with photons, which could provide complementary search channels.

show abstract

“…These are consistent with the later discovery of the 125 GeV state. For the case of a mass of the charged Higgs boson in the range 90 GeV to 160 GeV, the CDF and D0 experiments extracted a limit for the BR(t → H + b) of ≈ 20% considering both cases BR(H + → cs) = 1 and BR(H + → τ + ν) = 1 [35][36][37].…”

Section: Benchmark Scenariosmentioning

confidence: 99%

Light charged Higgs boson production at the Large Hadron electron Collider

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We study the production of a light charged Higgs boson at the future Large Hadron electron Collider (LHeC), through the process e − p → νeH − q, considering both decay channels H − → bc and H − → τντ in the final state. We analyse these processes in the context of the 2-Higgs Doublet Model Type III (2HDM-III) and assess the LHeC sensitivity to such H − signals against a variety of both reducible and irreducible backgrounds. We confirm that prospects for H − detection in the 2HDM-III are excellent assuming standard collider energy and luminosity conditions.

show abstract

Search for Resonant Diphoton Production with the D0 Detector

Cited by 143 publications

References 22 publications

Light charged Higgs boson with dominant decay to quarks and its search at the LHC and future colliders

Light charged Higgs boson with dominant decay to quarks and its search at the LHC and future colliders

Confronting the neutralino and chargino sector of the NMSSM with the multilepton searches at the LHC

Light charged Higgs boson production at the Large Hadron electron Collider

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About