1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.34.902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for neutron-antineutron oscillation inO16nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major sources of errors in the detection efficiency are the results of uncertainties in the models for propagation of pions and omega mesons through the residual nucleus. In particular, the error due to uncertainties in the π-nucleon cross section is 20.0%, as estimated from the π- 16 O scattering data shown in [13] and by comparing results from two independent nuclear interaction programs originally developed by IMB [13] and by Kamiokande [14] (6.1%). The uncertainty from the (n + nucleon) annihilation branching ratios is estimated to be 4.6% by comparing different MC results based on variations in the assumed branching ratios [28,29].…”
Section: Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major sources of errors in the detection efficiency are the results of uncertainties in the models for propagation of pions and omega mesons through the residual nucleus. In particular, the error due to uncertainties in the π-nucleon cross section is 20.0%, as estimated from the π- 16 O scattering data shown in [13] and by comparing results from two independent nuclear interaction programs originally developed by IMB [13] and by Kamiokande [14] (6.1%). The uncertainty from the (n + nucleon) annihilation branching ratios is estimated to be 4.6% by comparing different MC results based on variations in the assumed branching ratios [28,29].…”
Section: Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous best 90 % confidence level (C.L.) lifetime limits for bound neutrons are from IMB with 1.7 and 2.4 ×10 31 year [13] in two different analyses, Kamiokande with 4.3 × 10 31 year in oxygen [14], Soudan 2 with 7.2 × 10 31 year in iron [15], and Frejus with 6.5 × 10 31 year in iron [16]. The current best limit on the oscillation time of unbound neutrons is given by ILL (Grenoble) as 0.86 × 10 8 seconds [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, if we choose the strange quark component in the nucleon to be about 1%, then choosing λ 1 λ ′ 12 ≃ 10 −4 , we find that G ∆B=2 ≃ 10 −27 GeV −5 which corresponds to the present limit on τ N −N ∼ 10 8 sec. [3,4].…”
Section: Neutron-anti-neutron Oscillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…caused by this process (leading to multipion final states) of τ m.i. > ∼ 0.6 × 10 32 yrs which, with reasonable inputs for the nuclear potentials V n and Vn, have yielded a current limit very close to that from searches with free n's: τ nn ≥ 1.2 × 10 8 sec, i.e., |δm| ≤ 0.6 × 10 −32 GeV [25]. In 4D, H ef f consists of a sum of six-quark operators O i with coefficients c i having (mass) dimension −5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Requiring that the resultant value of |δm| be less than the experimental limit, 1/(1.2 × 10 8 sec) = 0.55 × 10 −32 GeV [24,25], we obtain the bound The uncertainty in the calculation of the matrix element n|O 4 |n is relatively unimportant for our bound because of the 1/9 power in (13) [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%