1995
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01612-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for anomalous Z → γγγ events at LEP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This production mechanism is intermediate between that of pp experiments such as that given in [21], and that of the possible production through e + e − collisions [182], and conceivably might yield a cleaner interpretation if monopole condensates are responsible for the confinement of quarks [15,207,208,209]. Although the mass limits determined are not as strong as in our experiment described in the previous section, it is crucial that different physical domains be explored carefully.…”
Section: H1 Limitsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This production mechanism is intermediate between that of pp experiments such as that given in [21], and that of the possible production through e + e − collisions [182], and conceivably might yield a cleaner interpretation if monopole condensates are responsible for the confinement of quarks [15,207,208,209]. Although the mass limits determined are not as strong as in our experiment described in the previous section, it is crucial that different physical domains be explored carefully.…”
Section: H1 Limitsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…De Rújula in 1995 [181] proposed looking at the three-photon decay of the Z boson, where the process proceeds through a virtual monopole loop, as shown in figure 13. If we use his formula for the branching ratio for the Z → 3γ process, compared to the current experimental upper limit [182] for the branching ratio of 10 −5 , we can rule out monopole masses lower than about 400 GeV, rather than the 600 GeV quoted by De Rújula. Similarly, Ginzburg and Panfil in 1982 [183] and more recently Ginzburg and Schiller in 1999 [184,185] considered the production of two photons with high transverse momenta by the collision of two photons produced either from e + e − or qq collisions.…”
Section: Indirect Searchesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since a simple three photon final state at an e + e − collider should be relatively clean, we do not expect there to be a big difference in the signal acceptance if we were to include a simulated detector response and ISR effects. At the Z-pole, the analysis chosen was by the L3 experiment [56], while the higher energy run with the highest integrated luminosity came from DELPHI [57]. Precise details of each selection can be found in appendix B but they can be generally summarised as requiring a pair of isolated, well identified photons above a certain energy threshold within an angular acceptance accompanied by a third photon with slightly relaxed criteria.…”
Section: Triphoton Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LEP II and OPAL have 2γ and 3γ data [120], which are employed to put the bounds on the process, e þ e − → γ=Z ⋆ → aγ → 2γ þγ. The L3 Collaboration has searched the process Z → aγ → ðγγÞγ at the Z pole, with a limit on the BR of order 10 −5 [67]. The ATLAS 3γ and Z → 3γ [121,122] search can be translated to the ALP bound as derived in Ref.…”
Section: Axionlike Particlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this topic has been addressed for some specific models [56][57][58][59][60]. Large Electron-Positron collider (LEP) has also searched for exotic Z decays into light Higgs [61,62], two light Higgs in the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model [63], photon and missing energy [64][65][66], and three photons [67]. There are also direct searches for DM particles at LEP-II via mono photon final states [68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%