2019
DOI: 10.1177/0731684419862346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for accurate RSM metamodels for structural engineering

Abstract: With rapid advancement in computing power and development of numerical tools and scientific theories in fields like structural engineering, simple experiments can now be carried out in-silico. However, simulating many real-life phenomena in analytical fields still remains largely intractable or requires huge computational resources. A number of researchers have developed suitable metamodels to reduce the computational time needed to solve complex structural problems. As such, response surface method has become… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, sometimes the R 2 value can be misleading, as adding more terms to a polynomial regression model will in general increase the R 2 . Hence, as emphasized by Kalita et al [26] in a recent study, all researchers should rely more on the adjusted R 2 values.…”
Section: Building the Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, sometimes the R 2 value can be misleading, as adding more terms to a polynomial regression model will in general increase the R 2 . Hence, as emphasized by Kalita et al [26] in a recent study, all researchers should rely more on the adjusted R 2 values.…”
Section: Building the Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the experiment, cutting speed, feed rate and axial cutting depth were selected for the test design of three factors and three levels. 32 This design requires 20 sets of tests, which include 8 sets of factor designs, 6 sets of centre point designs, and 6 sets of axial point designs. The experiment’s design and results are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Experiments Of Tool Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also used to evaluate the regression line between y a and ŷp values. The closer to one is the coefficient of determination for these two values, the better has worked the regression model for predicting the stress concentration factor [45].…”
Section: Model Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%