2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11001-017-9323-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seafloor change detection using multibeam echosounder backscatter: case study on the Belgian part of the North Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(44 reference statements)
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is necessary to keep in mind that a set of samples that is too small can lead to a falsified accuracy result [68]. Some studies have presented results of seabed mapping after analysis of similarly small but representative numbers of ground-truth samples [10,17,42,49]. In any such case, there is a possibility of errors, for which the sources have been described in detail (e.g., [69]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is necessary to keep in mind that a set of samples that is too small can lead to a falsified accuracy result [68]. Some studies have presented results of seabed mapping after analysis of similarly small but representative numbers of ground-truth samples [10,17,42,49]. In any such case, there is a possibility of errors, for which the sources have been described in detail (e.g., [69]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research will be conducted using the same model of multibeam echosounder device but with an acoustically calibrated option regarding the backscatter strength. Therefore, the composition of the seafloor will be represented from a physical point of view, which would create new perspectives in benthic habitat mapping, such as the ability to track spatial changes of habitats over time [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The backscatter AR was here a particularly useful measurement, not only to gain a physical understanding of the backscattering characteristics of the substrate type (the AR curves show three distinct shapes characteristic of each substrate type; see Figure 6A-C), but also to detect the presence of a weak azimuthal-like dependence thanks to the BS values measured in the steep-angle range (see [39]). This would have been impossible using solely backscatter mosaics, which by nature lack the angular component (as the change detection carried out in [72,73]). This shows that a compensation of mosaicked backscatter imagery using an angular interval in the range 30 • -60 • (as in e.g., FMGT standard processing) would omit the azimuthal dependence (which in this gravelly/hillocky terrain extended only up until 18 • ) while assessing changes of interest (i.e., sediment type at oblique angles) within such seafloor types.…”
Section: Experiments 1-offshore Gravel Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bathymetry of the seafloors has usually been determined using conventional echosounders [6][7][8][9]. However, as the echosounders are usually fixed in ships [7,10], such echosounder that the scan width of the echosounders will become narrow as the water becomes shallow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%