2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEA monitoring in Swedish regional transport infrastructure plans — Improvement opportunities identified in practical experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical evidence of SEA monitoring application, for instance in England, Germany and Canada, shows that the identification and evaluation of unforeseen, emerging and external issues have not been a focal point in SEA monitoring (Hanusch andGlasson 2008, Gacheciladze et al 2009). Moreover, in their studies of different regional planning schemes in Sweden, both Lundberg et al (2010) and Wallgren et al (2011) found that monitoring was limited to controlling if measures set out in strategic initiatives were implemented, completely overlooking the observations of the actual measured impacts on the physical environment. Overall, a lack of methodological application and formalized routines for monitoring and evaluating the effects of strategic initiatives has been found in the studies of concrete SEA monitoring applications (Gacheciladze et al 2009, Lundberg et al 2010, Wallgren et al 2011.…”
Section: General Background and Gap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Empirical evidence of SEA monitoring application, for instance in England, Germany and Canada, shows that the identification and evaluation of unforeseen, emerging and external issues have not been a focal point in SEA monitoring (Hanusch andGlasson 2008, Gacheciladze et al 2009). Moreover, in their studies of different regional planning schemes in Sweden, both Lundberg et al (2010) and Wallgren et al (2011) found that monitoring was limited to controlling if measures set out in strategic initiatives were implemented, completely overlooking the observations of the actual measured impacts on the physical environment. Overall, a lack of methodological application and formalized routines for monitoring and evaluating the effects of strategic initiatives has been found in the studies of concrete SEA monitoring applications (Gacheciladze et al 2009, Lundberg et al 2010, Wallgren et al 2011.…”
Section: General Background and Gap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monitoring requirement of the SEA Directive should further address the significant environmental impacts and results expected from the assessed strategic initiative. If monitoring is then understood and introduced only as a last independent step, after decisions have been made, its function in SEA may be limited to only following up whether decisions are formally implemented (Lundberg et al 2010, Wallgren et al 2011. With regard to the actual environmental change that is affected by the assessed initiative, however, the example of hydroclimatic change observations shows that they are deficient, with the major gaps in and remaining uncertainties from such deficient observations limiting our ability to monitor actual environmental changes with some sufficient degree of accuracy and certainty.…”
Section: Linking and Improving Arctic Sea Application And Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…VAN DOREN et al, 2013); (SCHULTZ, 2012); (GACHECHILADZE-BOZHESKU; FISCHER, 2012); (LUNDBERG et al, 2010) Tabela 1 -Critérios para avaliação da efetividade do tiering (conclusão).…”
Section: Proposição De Critériosunclassified