2015
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea lice, sockeye salmon, and foraging competition: lousy fish are lousy competitors

Abstract: Pathogens threaten wildlife globally, but these impacts are not restricted to direct mortality from disease. For fish, which experience periods of extremely high mortality during their early life history, infections may primarily influence population dynamics and conservation through indirect effects on ecological processes such as competition and predation. We conducted a competitive foraging experiment using outmigrating juvenile Fraser River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) to determine whether fish with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…clemensi rather than L . salmonis , which is consistent with previous reports (Price et al ., ; Godwin et al ., ). As only six of the 369 lice were L .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…clemensi rather than L . salmonis , which is consistent with previous reports (Price et al ., ; Godwin et al ., ). As only six of the 369 lice were L .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While direct mortality from sea lice is probably very low for O . nerka (Jakob et al ., ), the indirect effects of louse parasitism on these fish are unknown apart from an association with reduced competitive ability in highly infected fish (Godwin et al ., ). Oncorhynchus nerka are of particular interest because of their iconic status, their importance to fisheries (FAO, ), and their complex multi‐host dynamics with sea lice; C .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on earlier studies (Gjelland et al, 2014;Godwin et al, 2015;Skaala et al, 2014;Vollset et al, 2016) , we expected to see higher predation and other mortality in the untreated group and in the high infestation years. In addition to trout adapting their behaviour to infestation pressure as discussed above, the results of this study might be also partly explained by both the high individual variability in behaviour among the tagged trout, and relatively large emigrated and unknown fate groups, that led to relatively small-sized remaining fate groups.…”
Section: Migratory Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Farmed fish are often exposed to pathogens from sympatric wild fish populations, but are sheltered from many of the natural processes (e.g. predation [5], competition [6], migration [7,8]) that can remove infected individuals from populations. Farmed host populations are typically held at higher densities than populations in the wild, increasing opportunities for infections to spread.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%