2021
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea ice reduction drives genetic differentiation among Barents Sea polar bears

Abstract: Loss of Arctic sea ice owing to climate change is predicted to reduce both genetic diversity and gene flow in ice-dependent species, with potentially negative consequences for their long-term viability. Here, we tested for the population-genetic impacts of reduced sea ice cover on the polar bear ( Ursus maritimus ) sampled across two decades (1995–2016) from the Svalbard Archipelago, Norway, an area that is affected by rapid sea ice loss in the Arctic Barents Sea. We analysed genetic va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, they merely indicated close relationships (population sharing) between the target C and one of the sources, because the presence of segments that are identical by descent will inflict a downward deviation in the f 3 -statistic estimators (for the exact derivation of the deviation on the level of single individuals see SI Appendix , section S15 ). Such cases included polar bear individuals from the Svalbard Archipelago (PB3/PB8, PB5/PB14, and PB7/PB9), where the highly significantly negative f 3 values may indicate familial relationships or inbreeding among Svalbard Archipelago polar bears ( 36 ). West Greenland polar bears also appeared to be close relatives of one another, particularly BGI-PB47/BGI-PB10, although less so compared to the aforementioned Svalbard individuals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, they merely indicated close relationships (population sharing) between the target C and one of the sources, because the presence of segments that are identical by descent will inflict a downward deviation in the f 3 -statistic estimators (for the exact derivation of the deviation on the level of single individuals see SI Appendix , section S15 ). Such cases included polar bear individuals from the Svalbard Archipelago (PB3/PB8, PB5/PB14, and PB7/PB9), where the highly significantly negative f 3 values may indicate familial relationships or inbreeding among Svalbard Archipelago polar bears ( 36 ). West Greenland polar bears also appeared to be close relatives of one another, particularly BGI-PB47/BGI-PB10, although less so compared to the aforementioned Svalbard individuals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, they merely indicated close relationships (population sharing) between the target C and one of the sources, because the presence of segments that are identical by descent will inflict a downwards deviation in the f 3 -statistic estimators (for the exact derivation of the deviation on the level of single individuals, see SI Appendix , Text S15). Such cases included polar bear individuals from the Svalbard Archipelago (PB3/PB8, PB5/PB14, and PB7/PB9), where the highly significantly negative f 3 values may indicate familial relationships or inbreeding among Svalbard Archipelago polar bears (35). West Greenland polar bears also appeared to be close relatives of one another, particularly BGI-PB47/BGI-PB10, although less so compared to the aforementioned Svalbard individuals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, however, the selective pressures incurred by habitat loss and other climate-related impacts will most likely outweigh any potential for adaptive evolutionary change catalyzed by hybridization. The current fragmentation of sea ice habitat is predicted to reduce gene flow among polar bear populations, resulting in increased local inbreeding and overall diversity loss (35). The marked differences between brown and polar bear population histories and genetic diversities, wherein polar bears show the signature of an ancient steep decline in population size with adverse effects to their genetic diversity, may be a testament to the impact of similar responses in the past.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But loss of denning areas does present a form of habitat fragmentation that might result in reduced connectivity across the population if it persists over a longer period. This is supported by the exhibited high degree of site fidelity in Barents Sea polar bears in terms of denning areas as well as year-round area use, which is even visible across generations (Zeyl et al 2009;Lone et al 2013;Brun et al 2021), and a recent increased genetic structure between different areas within Svalbard that best may be explained by less gene flow from the bears living offshore (Maduna et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%