2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2055231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SCUBA-2: an update on the performance of the 10,000 pixel bolometer camera after two years of science operation at the JCMT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each individual survey field is sampled using a regular grid (see Fig. 3 of Moore et al 2015) of eleven circular tiles with diameter of one degree, observed using the pong3600 mode of SCUBA-2 (Bintley et al 2014). Each individual pong3600 takes 40-45 minutes to observe and reaches a pixel-to-pixel rms of ∼ 92 mJy beam −1 in the assigned weather band, when reduced with 3-arcsec pixels.…”
Section: Observing Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each individual survey field is sampled using a regular grid (see Fig. 3 of Moore et al 2015) of eleven circular tiles with diameter of one degree, observed using the pong3600 mode of SCUBA-2 (Bintley et al 2014). Each individual pong3600 takes 40-45 minutes to observe and reaches a pixel-to-pixel rms of ∼ 92 mJy beam −1 in the assigned weather band, when reduced with 3-arcsec pixels.…”
Section: Observing Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perseus was observed by SCUBA-2 at 450 µm and 850 µm in ten ∼ 30 ′ fields. Each field was observed multiple times with a PONG1800 observing pattern, where the instrument makes five square scans that are successively rotated by 18 • on the sky (see Kackley et al 2010;Holland et al 2013;Bintley et al 2014). Each field was reduced separately and then mosaicked together using the SMURF package in Starlink (Jenness et al 2011;Chapin et al 2013;Currie et al 2014) using user-defined masks to identify regions of bright emission in a second iteration of the reduction (e.g., see Mairs et al 2015).…”
Section: Scuba-2 Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a higher TES bias and lower heater setting will in general put more of the sub-array into transition but reduces the detector responsivity. We have found, however, that a lower TES bias gives improved detector noise performance 9 . The optimum array setup for scan mode observing is therefore a compromise between the noise performance of individual detectors and the number of working detectors on each sub-array, in order to give the overall fastest mapping speed of the instrument.…”
Section: Flux Jumpingmentioning
confidence: 98%