Enhancing Crop Genepool Use: Capturing Wild Relative and Landrace Diversity for Crop Improvement 2016
DOI: 10.1079/9781780646138.0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening wild Vigna species and cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) landraces for sources of resistance to Striga gesnerioides .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the unique traits of the wild accessions, such as their leaf, stem, and petiole pubescence, which are not found in the checks, might have existed in those checks but disappeared with time during the domestication process. They could have a potential use, if they are domesticated, since they are thought to be responsible for some beneficial traits, such as the resistance to diseases and pests [15,16]. Therefore, it might be time to start examining some of the traits from the wild species that have disappeared in order to domesticate new species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of the unique traits of the wild accessions, such as their leaf, stem, and petiole pubescence, which are not found in the checks, might have existed in those checks but disappeared with time during the domestication process. They could have a potential use, if they are domesticated, since they are thought to be responsible for some beneficial traits, such as the resistance to diseases and pests [15,16]. Therefore, it might be time to start examining some of the traits from the wild species that have disappeared in order to domesticate new species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on thirty (30) characteristics (both qualitative and quantitative) were recorded using both IPGRI (International Plant Genetic Resource Institute) and NBPGR (National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources) descriptors [12]. Fifteen (15) qualitative and fifteen (15) quantitative characters were recorded. The descriptors used for the characterization of the wild Vigna in this study are found in Table 1 below.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some wild cowpea relatives were evaluated for their reactions to the parasite in highly Striga infested fields at Minjibir near Kano in northern Nigeria located in the Sudan savannah agroecology and some of them showed high levels of resistance. Among the wild cowpea relatives that showed immunity to Striga are TVNu-1070, TVNu-1083, TVNu-585, TVNu-1535, TVNu-1537, TVNu-1647, and TVNu-491 belonging to the following Vigna species: ambacensis , parkeri , oblongifolia , and reticulata ( Oyatomi et al, 2016 ). Only one Striga resistant accession, TVNu-1589, among the tested wild relatives belong to section Catiang .…”
Section: Useful Traits Present In Some Wild Cowpea Relativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, despite the considerable morphological diversity, limited genetic diversity occurs among cultivated cowpea varieties owing to a single domestication event that has given rise to all other cultivated varieties [ 85 ]. However, publications also show that there are some genetic differences depending on the region of cultivation, and these can be used in traditional breeding to improve cowpea varieties [ 2 , 87 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 ]. It is known that there are barriers to hybridization, or recombination between members of the different cultivar groups, or with wild cowpea (var.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%