Measurement of fluorescence lifetime is a well-established technique, which has recently been introduced into the portfolio of assay formats used in high-throughput screening (HTS). This investigation establishes appropriate conditions for using lifetime measurements to reduce the impact of compound interference effects during large-scale HTS of corporate screening files. Experimental data on mixtures of standard fluorophores and interfering compounds (from 5 HTS campaigns) have been combined with a theoretical model to identify the minimum data quality required, defined by the photon count in the peak channel, for discrimination of biological activity. Single-component fluorophore lifetimes can be recovered with an error of 1%, with a peak photon count of 10 2 , but the same accuracy with a 2-component decay requires a peak photon count of 10 3 . When a 3rd component is introduced, the minimum peak count increases to 10 4 . The influence of scattered light on lifetime determination was investigated using an emulsion (diameters 25-675 nm). The measured decays of interfering compounds, identified as autofluorescent, show that the vast majority have a very short lifetime that can readily be resolved from the reporter fluorophore, using appropriate data-fitting methods. ( analytical methods has given benefits of increased sensitivity and speed along with reduced reaction volume and environmental impact, especially in the application of highthroughput screening (HTS) of large corporate compound collections.1 However, compared to radiometric assay formats, fluorescence methods introduce increased opportunities for compound interference effects.2 The fraction of compounds in an HTS campaign that interfere with bioassays in a deleterious manner may be significant compared to those having genuine biological activity leading to a greater burden on compound logistics in hit follow-up.3 More important, however, a significant proportion of reproducible false positives can cause difficulties in the analysis of the screen output, with the worst-case scenario being when a compound with genuine biological activity is overlooked in favor of interfering compounds. 4 Several modes of action have been described for interfering compounds, which are a consequence of their underlying physicochemical properties. Weakly or insoluble compounds can interfere with optical detection by generating light-scattering aggregates. More subtly, aggregates themselves can act as adsorption centers and sequestrate biomolecules in a manner that mimics a true inhibition-type response. 5,6 Other optical effects include light absorption due to colored compounds, quenching by a compound of the fluorescent emission of a reporter fluorophore, and compounds having intrinsic fluorescence over the spectral range of the reporter fluorophore.2,7 To attempt to address these deficiencies, the HTS community has advanced assay and detection technology, with approaches such as time-resolved fluorescence resonant energy transfer, now available.8 Although some success ...