2015
DOI: 10.1539/joh.14-0243-oa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of dry eye disease in visual display terminal workers during occupational health examinations: The Moriguchi study

Abstract: 253Motoko KAWASHIMA, et al.: Screening of dry eye in visual display terminal workers test are simple, noninvasive, and inexpensive methods for screening DED during occupational health examinations. (J Occup Health 2015; 57: 253-258) Key words: Dry eye disease, Occupational health examination, Ophthalmologists, Quality of life, Screening, Visual display terminal Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial condition causing ocular discomfort, visual disturbance, and tear film instability with potential damage … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yazici et al 16 reported that the incidence of dry eye among individuals who used VDTs for an average of 6.9 hours/day was 27.4%, while this rate was 15.4% among those used VDTs less than an hour per day. Similar to the studies by Kawashima et al 15 and Yazici et al 16 , the average duration of VDT use in our study was nearly 6 hours and 52.8% of participants had symptoms of dry eye. This result seems compatible with the studies in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yazici et al 16 reported that the incidence of dry eye among individuals who used VDTs for an average of 6.9 hours/day was 27.4%, while this rate was 15.4% among those used VDTs less than an hour per day. Similar to the studies by Kawashima et al 15 and Yazici et al 16 , the average duration of VDT use in our study was nearly 6 hours and 52.8% of participants had symptoms of dry eye. This result seems compatible with the studies in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A meta-analysis by Courtin et al 14 showed that the prevalence of dry eye among individuals who used video display terminals (VDTs) for long periods was between 9.5% and 87.5%, with a mean prevalence of 49.5%. In another study by Kawashima et al 15 , the prevalence of dry eye among workers using VDTs for an average of six hours a day was 60%. Yazici et al 16 reported that the incidence of dry eye among individuals who used VDTs for an average of 6.9 hours/day was 27.4%, while this rate was 15.4% among those used VDTs less than an hour per day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Kawashima et al . 47 revealed that 60% of the workers using VDT had DED, which might cause a significant impairment of the productivity of the workers 48 . Prolonged VDT use may be associated with decreased blinking rates and increased tear evaporation, which can lead to tear film instability and hyperosmolarity, and eventually short break-up time type DED 6,48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, readers of electronic books with liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors also experienced marked visual fatigue [ 15 ]. In addition, dry eye syndrome is more common in those who work on computers and has been reported in up to 60% of individuals who work with video monitors [ 16 ]. This prevalence is very high when considering the prevalence of dry eye syndrome in the general population is approximately 10% [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%