“…In particular, participants with diabetes who had visited a general practitioner or internist during the past year were less likely to report an annual eye care visit. Previous research indicates a lack of attention to screening for diabetic retinopathy among general practitioners [10,19] but the exact reasons for this insufficient utilization of eye care among those with access to general medical services remains to be proven and investigated by future studies. The decrease of yearly contacts to eye-care providers was more pronounced in groups that are more affected by poor glycemic control and diabetes-related complications and comorbidities [44,45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, physicians treating patients with diabetes are often not following guidelines to recommend annual comprehensive eye examination, often do not remind patients with diabetes to seek eye care, and do not refer diabetic patients to a qualified optometrist or ophthalmologist [21,53e55]. While the U.S. and UK are considering to extend the screening interval for those without preexisting diabetic eye disease and mild diabetes beyond the established one year interval [12,14,56,57], guidelines in Germany still recommend yearly examinations for all diabetic patients [10,11]. Screening for diabetic eye disease should focus on subjects with poor diabetic control, co-existing diabetic complications and comorbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compliance with consulting eye care specialists among the most vulnerable diabetes populations at recommended intervals might be enhanced by improving access to eye care and implementing and expanding existing educational programs to raise awareness regarding the importance of routine follow-up eye examinations. More research is needed to assess whether improved access and compliance with the recommended follow-up examinations result in improved diabetes outcomes, including reduction in vision loss, in Germany [10,50]. Evidence from the U.S. suggests that regular checkups can reduce low vision and blindness [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, despite the recommendation of regular check-up examination, receipt of the recommended examinations remains quite low [15], especially in European countries [13] e only 30%e53% of those with diabetes have annual eye examinations [16e18]. Research indicates a lack of attention to screening for diabetic retinopathy among general practitioners, diabetes specialists and low compliance with obtaining eye examinations at recommended intervals among patients with diabetes [10,19]. In the U.S., lack of insurance and financial constraints are frequently mentioned reasons for not having an annual eye-care visits by adults with diabetes [19e22].…”
“…In particular, participants with diabetes who had visited a general practitioner or internist during the past year were less likely to report an annual eye care visit. Previous research indicates a lack of attention to screening for diabetic retinopathy among general practitioners [10,19] but the exact reasons for this insufficient utilization of eye care among those with access to general medical services remains to be proven and investigated by future studies. The decrease of yearly contacts to eye-care providers was more pronounced in groups that are more affected by poor glycemic control and diabetes-related complications and comorbidities [44,45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, physicians treating patients with diabetes are often not following guidelines to recommend annual comprehensive eye examination, often do not remind patients with diabetes to seek eye care, and do not refer diabetic patients to a qualified optometrist or ophthalmologist [21,53e55]. While the U.S. and UK are considering to extend the screening interval for those without preexisting diabetic eye disease and mild diabetes beyond the established one year interval [12,14,56,57], guidelines in Germany still recommend yearly examinations for all diabetic patients [10,11]. Screening for diabetic eye disease should focus on subjects with poor diabetic control, co-existing diabetic complications and comorbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compliance with consulting eye care specialists among the most vulnerable diabetes populations at recommended intervals might be enhanced by improving access to eye care and implementing and expanding existing educational programs to raise awareness regarding the importance of routine follow-up eye examinations. More research is needed to assess whether improved access and compliance with the recommended follow-up examinations result in improved diabetes outcomes, including reduction in vision loss, in Germany [10,50]. Evidence from the U.S. suggests that regular checkups can reduce low vision and blindness [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, despite the recommendation of regular check-up examination, receipt of the recommended examinations remains quite low [15], especially in European countries [13] e only 30%e53% of those with diabetes have annual eye examinations [16e18]. Research indicates a lack of attention to screening for diabetic retinopathy among general practitioners, diabetes specialists and low compliance with obtaining eye examinations at recommended intervals among patients with diabetes [10,19]. In the U.S., lack of insurance and financial constraints are frequently mentioned reasons for not having an annual eye-care visits by adults with diabetes [19e22].…”
“…[42] In future, measurement of retinal capillary rarefaction with SLDF might be included in the yearly assessment. We suggest that the assessment of capillary rarefaction might be superior to retinopathy screening to identify patients at risk of developing end-organ damage at a very early stage.…”
PurposeIn diabetes mellitus type 2, capillary rarefaction plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of end-organ damage. We investigated retinal capillary density in patients with early disease.MethodsThis cross-sectional study compares retinal capillary rarefaction determined by intercapillary distance (ICD) and capillary area (CapA), measured non-invasively and in vivo by scanning laser Doppler flowmetry, in 73 patients with type 2 diabetes, 55 healthy controls and 134 individuals with hypertension stage 1 or 2.ResultsIn diabetic patients, ICD was greater (23.2±5.5 vs 20.2±4.2, p = 0.013) and CapA smaller (1592±595 vs 1821±652, p = 0.019) than in healthy controls after adjustment for differences in cardiovascular risk factors between the groups. Compared to hypertensive patients, diabetic individuals showed no difference in ICD (23.1±5.8, p = 0.781) and CapA (1556±649, p = 0.768).ConclusionIn the early stage of diabetes type 2, patients showed capillary rarefaction compared to healthy individuals.
The incidence of diabetes mellitus type 2 is greatly increasing worldwide. An early therapy with intensified control of diabetes and blood pressure is especially important to avoid delayed complications. In addition to diabetic foot syndrome, diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy still represent commonly occurring problems. Despite improvements in the quality of care, the targets of the St. Vincent Declaration have still not yet been achieved. Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy show parallels in the course of the disease and in the pathological anatomical alterations which have led to the inauguration of a diabetic renal-retinal syndrome. The ophthalmological assessment of the retina was previously considered to be a diagnostic aid for assessment of diabetic nephropathy; however, nowadays a simple estimation of the glomerular filtration rate using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula and determination of microalbuminuria can in contrast give ophthalmologists an early indication of the possible presence of microangiopathic alterations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.