2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2004.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for unilateral intracranial abnormalities using near infrared spectroscopy. A preliminary report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…28 The profound effect that the presence of hematomas or intracranial mass lesions can have on the cerebral NIRS parameters yielded within the context of TBI has led to this modality being examined as a screening tool for the presence of these lesions since the early 1990s. [29][30][31][32][33][34] Primarily, these investigations examined the mean difference in optical density between each cerebral hemisphere (DOD) as a means of localizing pathology or predicting the presence of a localized hematoma or mass lesion. Within this area of study, work conducted by Robertson and coworkers 31 examined parameters retrieved from > 300 patients under observation after sustaining a TBI.…”
Section: Davies Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 The profound effect that the presence of hematomas or intracranial mass lesions can have on the cerebral NIRS parameters yielded within the context of TBI has led to this modality being examined as a screening tool for the presence of these lesions since the early 1990s. [29][30][31][32][33][34] Primarily, these investigations examined the mean difference in optical density between each cerebral hemisphere (DOD) as a means of localizing pathology or predicting the presence of a localized hematoma or mass lesion. Within this area of study, work conducted by Robertson and coworkers 31 examined parameters retrieved from > 300 patients under observation after sustaining a TBI.…”
Section: Davies Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, as with many other monitoring modalities within the field of brain injury medicine, there is very limited evidence to support the ability of NIRS to predict outcome after injury. Although frequently referred to in limited clinical investigations, [17][18][19][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] no substantial prospective investigation provides useful information regarding how NIRS parameters can be used to predict the eventual impact of a particular injury. This in particular provides an opportunity for very meaningful investigations to be undertaken in the future.…”
Section: Davies Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults, NIRS technology can diagnose ICH on presentation, as well as late hematomas that develop (Francis et al, 2005;Gopinath et al, 1993Gopinath et al, ,1995Kahraman et al, 2006;Robertson et al, 1995Robertson et al, ,1997Zang et al, 2000). Although the type of hematoma (subdural [SDH] versus epidural [EDH]) cannot be determined, the presence of any hematoma would be useful to triage a patient for CT scanning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prior adult data (Francis et al, 2005;Gopinath et al, 1993Gopinath et al, ,1995Kahraman et al, 2006;Robertson et al, 1995Robertson et al, ,1997Zang et al, 2000) suggest that this goal is feasible with NIRS. In initial studies, the sensitivity for identification of traumatic extracerebral (EDH and SDH), and intracerebral hematomas, was 100% and 98%, respectively (Gopinath et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable early identification of intracranial hematomas in the field and emergency centers, a portable near-infrared (NIR) technology-based device has been used and proved high sensitivity and specificity in clinical trials for detecting hematomas larger than 3.5 mL and located within 2.5 cm depth [5][6][7][8] . More devices based on NIRS with different parameters (e.g., wavelengths, source-detector separations) are being developed for hematoma detection as well [9,10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%