2013
DOI: 10.3310/hta17350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for type 2 diabetes: a short report for the National Screening Committee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
68
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Although type 2 diabetes mellitus is induced by various environmental and genetic factors, its detailed aetiology is not yet fully understood. 2 Several studies have reported that multiple cytokines may be involved in the regulation of the immune response, which has in turn been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. 3,4 Interleukins are a diverse constellation of small cell signalling protein molecules, or cytokines, that regulate the function of the immune system in humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Although type 2 diabetes mellitus is induced by various environmental and genetic factors, its detailed aetiology is not yet fully understood. 2 Several studies have reported that multiple cytokines may be involved in the regulation of the immune response, which has in turn been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. 3,4 Interleukins are a diverse constellation of small cell signalling protein molecules, or cytokines, that regulate the function of the immune system in humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 While national and international diabetes associations call for screening of most adults over the age of 40-50 years and screening of all adults with risk factors, [20][21][22] other agencies recommend testing only in the setting of hypertension, 23,24 hyperlipidemia, 23 or as part of risk evaluation in patients with CVD. 25,26 Screening might be more common in large healthcare systems if adverse associations with diabetes, such as increased healthcare costs, were widely recognized to occur early in the natural history of the disease, at a time when adverse effects might be forestalled with preventive management. Higher rates of CVD, increased healthcare resource use, and higher costs have been reported before a clinical diagnosis of diabetes in data from the Nurses' Health Study, primary care clinics in the United Kingdom, and Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), respectively, [27][28][29][30][31] but there has been no coordinated study of the time course of adverse associations with early diabetes within a single healthcare system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, diabetes or prediabetes have been defined by glucose measurements based on a substantial body of evidence. 1,16 However, there is also consid- …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are unresolved issues around the identification of those at future risk of diabetes, but one option recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is to use glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). 1 This approach is controversial, but it would avoid the issue of poor repeatability and inconvenience of the oral glucose tolerance test which has dogged the area for many years. There is a growing body of evidence around the use of HbA1c in diagnosis and screening for diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%