2017
DOI: 10.1111/acer.13449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Hazardous Drinking in Nursing Home Residents: Evaluating the Validity of the Current Cutoffs of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption Questions by Using Ethyl Glucuronide in Hair

Abstract: Our data suggest that an AUDIT-C cutoff of ≥4 for men and ≥2 for women can be recommended to detect the consumption of ≥10 g of alcohol/d in the elderly. Because the nursing staff to a large extent underestimates the alcohol consumption among nursing home residents, further teaching of the staff, improvement of screening instruments for the elderly, and the use of objective biomarkers might be helpful for recognizing hazardous drinking and can thus help improve the quality of life of the elderly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, when considering only the group of drivers who admitted alcohol consumption ≥ 4 times per week, the correlation between AUDIT scores and EtG concentrations was much higher (r=0.51, p=0.009). Similar degrees of correlation were found between AUDIT scores and hair EtG concentrations by Dreher-Weber et al [22] (r= 0.361, p<0.001) in 344 nursing home residents, and by Marques et al [23] (r= 0.23, p<0.01) in 146 DUI drivers. Therefore, although in our pilot study AUDIT score was able to identify a higher number of cases with chronic consumption of alcohol, a combination of both tests would improve the detection of drivers with a chronic and probable problematic consumption of alcohol.…”
Section: Comparison Between Audit Score and Hair Analysis For Alcoholsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Nevertheless, when considering only the group of drivers who admitted alcohol consumption ≥ 4 times per week, the correlation between AUDIT scores and EtG concentrations was much higher (r=0.51, p=0.009). Similar degrees of correlation were found between AUDIT scores and hair EtG concentrations by Dreher-Weber et al [22] (r= 0.361, p<0.001) in 344 nursing home residents, and by Marques et al [23] (r= 0.23, p<0.01) in 146 DUI drivers. Therefore, although in our pilot study AUDIT score was able to identify a higher number of cases with chronic consumption of alcohol, a combination of both tests would improve the detection of drivers with a chronic and probable problematic consumption of alcohol.…”
Section: Comparison Between Audit Score and Hair Analysis For Alcoholsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…We found the AUDIT-C to perform well in identifying hazardous drinking, with an optimal cut-off of ≥5 for men and ≥4 for women, which yielded in men sensitivity and specificity values of 76.5% and 85.3%, respectively, and in women 100% and 74.1%, respectively. Our results are not quite in line with previous studies: Dreher-Weber, M., et al [27] suggested an AUDIT-C cut-off of ≥4 (sensitivity: 0.70 and specificity: 0.83) for older men and ≥2 (sensitivity: 0.70 and specificity: 0.83) for older women to detect the consumption of ≥10 g of alcohol per day, which is a lower threshold than we adopted. These cut-offs are stricter, but are intended for nursing home residents.…”
Section: The Audit-ccontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Secondly, it is well known that some people underestimate their alcohol intake for various reasons. This tendency might be a result of cognitive impairment [27] but may also be more likely in older adults in whom hazardous drinking might have a negative connotation [38]. Higher levels of social desirability have been reported when a situation has been judged as more unethical [39].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their results, residents with AUDs were studied as one group and compared with residents without AUDs. However, the studies of Dreher-Weber et al (2017) and Weyerer et al (1999) show a prevalence of problematic alcohol use in residents living in RCFs, 11.3 and 3.4 per cent, respectively, which means that the focus on negative health effects specifically in residents with AUDs is a small group compared to the total population of residents living in RCFs. The focus on health was also reflected in prevalence, policies and the role of care professionals.…”
Section: Alcoholmentioning
confidence: 97%