2017
DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2017.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Food Insecurity in Pediatric Primary Care: A Clinic’s Positive Implementation Experiences

Abstract: Our project's purpose was to assess the acceptability of a screening and intervention program to address food insecurity (FI) in pediatric primary care. We implemented systematic FI screening during routine health supervision visits. Our positive results can help to inform implementation of routine FI screening in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
15

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…17,27 Several additional studies provided indirect evidence around patient acceptability based on provider and staff perceptions of patient acceptability. 13,21,[28][29][30][31] These studies almost uniformly suggest that providers and clinical staff feel that screening is acceptable to patients. However, evidence on patient acceptability from these latter studies may partially reflect providers' own feelings around FI screening efforts.…”
Section: Patient And/or Patient Caregiver Acceptability Of Fi Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…17,27 Several additional studies provided indirect evidence around patient acceptability based on provider and staff perceptions of patient acceptability. 13,21,[28][29][30][31] These studies almost uniformly suggest that providers and clinical staff feel that screening is acceptable to patients. However, evidence on patient acceptability from these latter studies may partially reflect providers' own feelings around FI screening efforts.…”
Section: Patient And/or Patient Caregiver Acceptability Of Fi Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concern about the time required to carry out screening is common for sites implementing screening programs. Eleven articles addressed the perceived and actual time burden related to their FI screening tools, 13,17,18,26,28,31,[33][34][35][36] while two additional studies limited remarks to duration of screening itself 10,30 (see Table 4).…”
Section: Timel To Conduct Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 Despite recognizing the benefits to screening for and addressing FI, there have not been widespread primary care efforts for FI screening. 15 Barriers to routine screening include fear of reducing patient satisfaction, 16 fear of damaging the patient-physician relationship (eg, shame may prompt dishonest responses), 17 lack of time to conduct screening, and uncertainty with managing a positive screen. 18 The aim of this project was to explore patient attitudes and intervention preferences in the primary care setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para compreender como o objeto de pesquisa desta dissertação foi construído é necessário considerar que a minha formação profissional e acadêmica se deu em um contexto em que o reconhecimento do DHAA para abordar a SAN foi hegemônico. Essa abordagem logrou resultados reconhecidos no cenário internacional, colocando o Brasil numa posição de destaque quando o assunto é SAN 1 . Ainda que retrocessos estejam acontecendo, essa perspectiva teórica está consolidada, especialmente na comunidade científica que trabalha com esta temática.…”
Section: Palavrasunclassified