2009
DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2009.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Dysfunction to Promote Multidisciplinary Intervention by Using the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire

Abstract: The fourth version of the UW-QOL is suitable for routine screening in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it can be used as a stand-alone questionnaire, we use the HNC-PCI with the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire, version 4 (UWQoL), 13 which is a validated HNC-specific health-related QoL (HRQoL) tool that contains 12 domains scaled from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) according to the hierarchy of response. There are 2 subscale composite scores 14 : Physical function and Socialemotional function, and a single 6-point overall measure of QoL. Physical function is the simple mean score of the swallowing, chewing, speech, saliva, taste, and appearance domains.…”
Section: Application Of Hnc-pci Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it can be used as a stand-alone questionnaire, we use the HNC-PCI with the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire, version 4 (UWQoL), 13 which is a validated HNC-specific health-related QoL (HRQoL) tool that contains 12 domains scaled from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) according to the hierarchy of response. There are 2 subscale composite scores 14 : Physical function and Socialemotional function, and a single 6-point overall measure of QoL. Physical function is the simple mean score of the swallowing, chewing, speech, saliva, taste, and appearance domains.…”
Section: Application Of Hnc-pci Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UW-QOL has face, content, and construct validity. 14,15 Although factor analysis has been reported for other head and neck cancer-specific questionnaires, to our knowledge, it has never been reported for the UW-QOLv4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As part of the ethical consideration, ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethical Committee and informed consent from each of the subjects were obtained. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected using semi-structured questionnaire developed by the researcher, chemotherapy-induced TA scale (CiTAS) [10] to assess the status of taste, and University of Washington QOL questionnaire [11] to assess the QOL of patients. Subjects took approximately 30 minutes to complete the questionnaire.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%