1992
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400240029004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Cancers of the Cervix and Breast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incremental cost of screening divided by the avoided death cases resulted in 16.6 to 33.8 million HUF per life gained. On the basis of a British study, the authors assumed that one avoided death case could result in 23 additional life-years [19]; therefore, one life-year gain can be achieved at 0.7 to 1.5 million HUF incremental cost. As the methodology and the assumptions of that cost-effectiveness analysis, especially the calculation of life-years gained and the constant treatment cost, were subject to criticism, the Ministry of Health initiated an economic evaluation of intensified cervical screening in a disease state economic model under the leadership of the Institute of Healthcare Quality Improvement and Hospital Engineering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incremental cost of screening divided by the avoided death cases resulted in 16.6 to 33.8 million HUF per life gained. On the basis of a British study, the authors assumed that one avoided death case could result in 23 additional life-years [19]; therefore, one life-year gain can be achieved at 0.7 to 1.5 million HUF incremental cost. As the methodology and the assumptions of that cost-effectiveness analysis, especially the calculation of life-years gained and the constant treatment cost, were subject to criticism, the Ministry of Health initiated an economic evaluation of intensified cervical screening in a disease state economic model under the leadership of the Institute of Healthcare Quality Improvement and Hospital Engineering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%