2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00256-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy21Reprints are available from the AHRQ Web site at www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm, through the National Guideline Clearinghouse (www.guideline.gov), or in print through the AHRQ Clearinghouse (1-800-358-9295).22The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations based on this evidence review can be found in Screening for Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnancy: Recommendations and Rationale, available elsewhere in this supplement, and from the AHRQ Web site and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether or not screening for BV, prevents PTB remains to be debated [155,156,157]. While some recommend that treatment of BV reduces the risk of PTB, others report an increase in PTB following treatment for BV [158].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whether or not screening for BV, prevents PTB remains to be debated [155,156,157]. While some recommend that treatment of BV reduces the risk of PTB, others report an increase in PTB following treatment for BV [158].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, BVAB3 an anerobe prevalent in BV, was found to decrease the risk for PTB [133], a finding which may explain why come cases of BV may be involved in PTB and others not. Inconsistencies in clinical and laboratory detection methods used for the monitoring of treatment have a direct impact on success rates [76,83,155,159] thus complicating a comparison between the presence/absence of BV in PTB and full-term birth (FTB) [156]. Because different bacteria have different associations with Amsel diagnostic criteria, this may explain discrepancies often reported between Amsel criteria and microscopy [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(121), wherein three of the following four symptoms must be evident: 1) a homogenous, white, non-inflammatory discharge that smoothly coats the vaginal walls; 2) the presence of “clue” cells on microscopic examination (squamous epithelial cells covered with adherent bacteria); 3) a vaginal fluid pH over 4.5; and 4) a fishy odor of vaginal discharge before or after addition of 10% KOH (121). The reliability of the Amsel criteria have been subject to debate, particularly in reference to pregnancy given the increased vaginal discharge that is often experienced by pregnant women, and the variation of pH depending on how and where samples are taken (41). However, not all symptoms are observed in every case (56), and because the diagnosis is subjective, controversy persists about the definition of BV.…”
Section: Bacterial Vaginosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Nugent criteria are commonly used to assess BV, the scoring of specimens can be subjective. Nonetheless with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 83% (93) compared to Amsel criteria, the Nugent Gram-stain test remains the preferred diagnostic tool (41; 59) and it can be performed on self-collected vaginal smears (74), thus facilitating longitudinal field-based studies (14; 94). Interestingly, as much as 50% of all women with BV (as defined by Nugent score) are asymptomatic (4), which led to the use of the term “Nugent-score BV” (85).…”
Section: Bacterial Vaginosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…124133 Such efforts need to be revisited to focus both on clindamycin and early treatment. 86,87,134 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%