2002
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822002000200014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for antimicrobial activity of natural products using a microplate photometer

Abstract: The microdilution technique, using a microplate photometer, to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for a natural product was compared to the serial tube dilution method. The MIC obtained for Paepalantine against S. aureus was the same by the two methods, showing an antimicrobial effect similar to chloramphenicol.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The first absorbance was subtracted from the second absorbance, and the difference was used to calculate the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. The lowest concentration that produced an inhibitory effect was recorded as the MIC for each extract (as described by Devienne & Raddi, 2002, with some modifications). Ampicillin (100 mg/mL concentration) for bacteria and amphotericin B (50 mg/mL concentration) for yeast were utilized as positive controls.…”
Section: Determination Of Antimicrobial Activity By Microdilution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first absorbance was subtracted from the second absorbance, and the difference was used to calculate the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. The lowest concentration that produced an inhibitory effect was recorded as the MIC for each extract (as described by Devienne & Raddi, 2002, with some modifications). Ampicillin (100 mg/mL concentration) for bacteria and amphotericin B (50 mg/mL concentration) for yeast were utilized as positive controls.…”
Section: Determination Of Antimicrobial Activity By Microdilution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first absorbance was subtracted from the second absorbance, and the difference was used to calculate the MIC values. The lowest concentration that produced an inhibitory effect was recorded as the MIC for each extract (as described by Abbasoglu et al, 1995;Devienne & Raddi, 2002). Ampicillin (100 mg/mL concentration) for bacteria and amphotericin B (50 mg/mL concentration) for yeast were used as positive controls.…”
Section: Determination Of Antimicrobial Activity By the Micro-dilutiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorbance of the plates was measured using an ELISA reader at 630 nm (EL x 800). The lowest concentration that produced an inhibitory effect was recorded as the MIC for each extract as described by Devienne & Raddi (2002) with some modifications. Ampicillin (100 μg/mL concentration) for bacteria and Amphotericin B (50 μg/mL concentration) for yeast were used as positive controls.…”
Section: Determination Of the Antimicrobial Activity By The Micro Dilmentioning
confidence: 99%