2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening and Estimation of Allelic Differentiation in Indian mustard Using SSR Markers for Background Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, in this study, PIC values ranged from 0.33 (PSMP 2059) to 0.76 (PSMP 2203) ( Table 1) with an average of 0.55. In some of the previous reports, PIC values varying between 0.02 to 0.97 were reported [31,27,[35][36][37]. An average PIC value of 0.55 observed in the present study is similar to 0.56 and 0.58 reported by other investigators [27,29], respectively.…”
Section: Molecular Characterization and Ssr Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, in this study, PIC values ranged from 0.33 (PSMP 2059) to 0.76 (PSMP 2203) ( Table 1) with an average of 0.55. In some of the previous reports, PIC values varying between 0.02 to 0.97 were reported [31,27,[35][36][37]. An average PIC value of 0.55 observed in the present study is similar to 0.56 and 0.58 reported by other investigators [27,29], respectively.…”
Section: Molecular Characterization and Ssr Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…High PIC values may be observed due to the use of large number of informative markers [40]. Similar reports were observed in several other studies in different crops like pearl millet [12,27,28,29], rice [30,36] and brassica [31].…”
Section: Molecular Characterization and Ssr Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, PSMP2066 is the most informative and best marker for characterization followed by PSMP2077, CTM21 and PSMP2072 markers while maker IPES0218 was reported to be the least powerful marker. PIC values ranging from 0.02 to 0.97 were reported by many researchers [21,[23][24][25][26]. An average PIC value of 0.53 observed in the present study is similar to 0.55, 0.56 and 0.58 reported by other investigators [10,21,27], respectively.…”
Section: Molecular Characterization and Ssr Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…An average PIC value of 0.53 observed in the present study is similar to 0.55, 0.56 and 0.58 reported by other investigators [10,21,27], respectively. PIC values can range between 0 and 0.5 because of bi-allelic nature of SNPs while it can go above 0.5 in case of SSRs due to their mutli-allelic nature as reported by other researchers [10,17,23]. Thus, SSR markers are the most preferred and efficient markers due to their ability to detect multiallelic loci, easy to use, co-dominance, higher reproducibility, high polymorphism with vast ability to differentiate the genotypes [28].…”
Section: Molecular Characterization and Ssr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%