1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1993.tb00730.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening and assessment of childhood deafness: experience from a centralized multi‐disciplinary service

Abstract: A paediatric hearing assessment unit was set up in Lothian in 1978 to provide a clear referral pathway for children with suspected sensorineural hearing impairment and particularly for those children detected by the health visitor screening test. Over a 6-year-period the incidence of bilateral sensorineural deafness was 1.3/1000 suggesting that all children in the region were being seen. The mean age of diagnosis fell significantly over this period. Children in high risk groups, through adverse perinatal event… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A targeted neonatal screening programme commenced in April 1999, aimed at infants recognized to have risk factors for sensorineural hearing loss. In Edinburgh, we are clearly diagnosing children with significant sensorineural loss before the school entry screen, and are constantly reviewing performance to achieve NDCS quality assurance guidelines 2,7,8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A targeted neonatal screening programme commenced in April 1999, aimed at infants recognized to have risk factors for sensorineural hearing loss. In Edinburgh, we are clearly diagnosing children with significant sensorineural loss before the school entry screen, and are constantly reviewing performance to achieve NDCS quality assurance guidelines 2,7,8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Audit 9 produced a figure of 1.3 hearing impaired children per 1000, close to that found in comparable studies. This suggests that the majority of cases were identified (McClelland et al 1992;O'Hare, Grigor & Cowan 1993;Parving & Salomon 1993;Parving & Christensen 1992). In a recent unpublished regional audit, five out of 13 districts identified 50% or fewer of the expected number of cases of hearing loss and only four achieved 80% or better.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%