2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2021.203670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scratching aluminium alloys – Modelling and experimental assessment of damage as function of the strain rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the particles are discrete and interact only via their kernels, the method does not need additional separation formulations to allow for fracture. The GIMP method has been used before to simulate cutting and scratching of metals in good agreement with experiment by Leroch et al (2018), Varga et al (2019), Varga et al (2021. Moreover, in a recent publication, MPM has been applied to grinding processes to investigate the effect of different abrasive orientations, where it was found that there is no material removal at all but pure plowing when a cubic abrasive is oriented with an edge pointing in grinding direction, while the largest chip is formed when the cube is sliding on one of its faces (Eder et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Since the particles are discrete and interact only via their kernels, the method does not need additional separation formulations to allow for fracture. The GIMP method has been used before to simulate cutting and scratching of metals in good agreement with experiment by Leroch et al (2018), Varga et al (2019), Varga et al (2021. Moreover, in a recent publication, MPM has been applied to grinding processes to investigate the effect of different abrasive orientations, where it was found that there is no material removal at all but pure plowing when a cubic abrasive is oriented with an edge pointing in grinding direction, while the largest chip is formed when the cube is sliding on one of its faces (Eder et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In this work, pure aluminum was chosen for investigation, as the material features extensive strain hardening behavior during plastic deformation. Further, it was well characterized in a previous paper of the authors [23], so that the material parameters necessary for the numerical simulation were previously determined. The material is standardized under EN-AW1050A (AA1050) [24], and its chemical composition is given in Table 1.…”
Section: Materials Investigatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indenter features the same geometry as in the experiments, i.e., Rockwell C shape with 200 µm tip radius. A Coulomb coefficient of friction of 0.1 was set between indenter and sample, as this proved to be representative in previous works [23,28]. For numerical efficiency and to avoid instability issues occurring at long simulation times, only the central 2 mm part of the scratch was simulated at constant depth on an aluminum block the size of 1×3×0.4 mm.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimation of the real contact area between two contacting solids can be seen as an initial step towards investigating friction and wear of that contact, which are of uttermost interest in various engineering applications [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. In the context of metalworking, bulk forming operations such as hot rolling of Al alloys are greatly dependent on the contact conditions: the real area of contact partly defines the friction forces that move the workpiece through the roll bite [11], being thus a fundamental aspect of the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%