2022
DOI: 10.1111/his.14674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNAseq identification of FISH‐cryptic BCL6::TP63 rearrangement in ALK‐negative anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, cryptic TP63 rearrangements cannot formally be excluded, as recently described. 28 These latter would however not have been detected in previously published series based on FISH assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…On the other hand, cryptic TP63 rearrangements cannot formally be excluded, as recently described. 28 These latter would however not have been detected in previously published series based on FISH assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In other cases, such as the use of p63 IHC in identifying TP63- R, IHC facilitates a diagnostic approach to genetic subtyping but FISH is still required in a subset of cases 21. Importantly, false-negative FISH results due to cryptic structural alterations also can occur, as in the case of cryptic MYC- R in B-cell lymphomas34,35; we also recently identified a FISH-cryptic TP63- R in a case of ALK-negative ALCL 36. In the case of DUSP22- R, indeterminate FISH results occasionally occur in which the break-apart probe identifies loss of the 5′- DUSP22 signal and cannot distinguish between telomeric 6p deletion and an unbalanced DUSP22- R 37.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…21 Importantly, false-negative FISH results due to cryptic structural alterations also can occur, as in the case of cryptic MYC-R in B-cell lymphomas 34,35 ; we also recently identified a FISH-cryptic TP63-R in a case of ALK-negative ALCL. 36 In the case of DUSP22-R, indeterminate FISH results occasionally occur in which the break-apart probe identifies loss of the 5′-DUSP22 signal and cannot distinguish between telomeric 6p deletion and an unbalanced DUSP22-R. 37 In the future, platforms other than FISH might be employed in genetic subtyping. A gene expression signature successfully identified high-grade B-cell lymphomas with FISH-cryptic MYC-R or BCL2-R 35 and we previously developed and validated a gene expression signature for DUSP22-R in ALCL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%