“…In addition to some degree of under-treatment, recent studies document suboptimal performance of established risk prediction tools [e.g., the Framingham risk score, SCORE (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation), and CHA 2 DS 2 VASc (Congestive heart failure, hypertension, age C75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category)] in patients with CIDs, including psoriasis and RA, which underlines the need for increased focus on these patients [39, 55,[76][77][78][79]. Suboptimal CV screening and treatment practices in patients with CIDs may therefore represent a new aspect of the treatment-risk paradox, i.e., where patients in the highest risk score categories receive less evidence-based treatment [80].…”