2018
DOI: 10.1002/chir.22789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dutch Resolution of a configurationally stable [5]helquat

Abstract: Synthesis and nontrivial optical resolution of a helicene-like dication, helquat 1, has been accomplished. Starting with gram scale of the racemic helquat 1 sample, Dutch Resolution using family of 3 tartrate anions was key to achieve successful separation of M and P helical enantiomers of 1. Hundreds of milligrams of each enantiomer of this configurationally stable C -symmetric helquat have been obtained. Racemization barrier of 1 has been determined. To our knowledge this is the first report on Dutch Resolut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(139 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…230 Note that in 2017, in the case of similar Helquats for which diastereomeric resolution with dibenzoyltartrate alone failed, a Dutch resolution using a family of three derivatives of tartrate anions was the key to achieve efficient separation of (M) and (P) helical enantiomers of configurationally stable [5]Helquat [242][OTf]. 231 This latter helicene-like compounds displayed slightly longer half-life time (see Table 20). Furthermore, a [7]Helquat was also obtained in enantiopure form via preferential crystallization of its trifluoroacetate salt, which was found to be the only conglomerate among 12 different salts studied.…”
Section: Chemical Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…230 Note that in 2017, in the case of similar Helquats for which diastereomeric resolution with dibenzoyltartrate alone failed, a Dutch resolution using a family of three derivatives of tartrate anions was the key to achieve efficient separation of (M) and (P) helical enantiomers of configurationally stable [5]Helquat [242][OTf]. 231 This latter helicene-like compounds displayed slightly longer half-life time (see Table 20). Furthermore, a [7]Helquat was also obtained in enantiopure form via preferential crystallization of its trifluoroacetate salt, which was found to be the only conglomerate among 12 different salts studied.…”
Section: Chemical Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, thanks to their C 2 -symmetrical topology, a most favorable case for conglomerate occurrence, several helicene derivatives undergo spontaneous resolution. , Taking advantage of this phenomenon, Teply et al could perform a preferential crystallization experiment and obtain enantiopure samples up to 10.5 g scale of [5]­Helquat salt 241 . Note that in 2017, in the case of similar Helquats for which diastereomeric resolution with dibenzoyltartrate alone failed, a Dutch resolution using a family of three derivatives of tartrate anions was the key to achieve efficient separation of ( M ) and ( P ) helical enantiomers of configurationally stable [5]­Helquat [ 242 ]­[OTf] . This latter helicene-like compounds displayed slightly longer half-life time (see Table ).…”
Section: Helicenes Substituted With Nitrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they are similar to helquats-structurally related compounds containing also two quaternary nitrogen atoms in their helical molecules. Helquat enantiomers were successfully separated by CE in the acidic sodium phosphate BGE (22 mM NaOH, 35 mM H 3 PO 4 , pH 2.5) using randomly sulfated S-α-, S-β-, and S-γ-CDs at 6 mM concentration as chiral stereoselectors [27][28][29]. For that reason, the same experimental conditions were first tested also for the enantioseparation of DQs.…”
Section: The Selection Of Experimental Conditions and The Ce Separati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the native and especially the charged derivatized cyclodextrins (CDs) belong to the most often and the most successfully used chiral selectors [24][25][26]. CE using randomly sulfated α-, β-, and γ-CDs (S-α-CD, S-β-CD, and S-γ-CD, respectively) as chiral selectors was able to separate helquat enantiomers [27][28][29]. Because of the structural similarity between helquats [9] and diquats [17] (both of them being dicationic N-heteroaromatic electron-deficient molecules with axial/helical chirality and absorbing radiation in the low UV region), the aim of this work was to develop a CE method for the separation of the enantiomers of 11 DQ derivatives using the chiral selectors of the same class, that is, randomly highly sulfated α-, β-, and γ-CDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%