2015
DOI: 10.1111/head.12583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AVP‐825 Breath‐Powered Intranasal Delivery System Containing 22 mg Sumatriptan Powder vs 100 mg Oral Sumatriptan in the Acute Treatment of Migraines (The COMPASS Study): A Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial Across Multiple Attacks

Abstract: ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of AVP-825, an investigational bi-directional breath-powered intranasal delivery system containing low-dose (22 mg) sumatriptan powder, vs 100 mg oral sumatriptan for acute treatment of migraine in a double-dummy, randomized comparative efficacy clinical trial allowing treatment across multiple migraine attacks.BackgroundIn phases 2 and 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, AVP-825 provided early and sustained relief… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigators also noted that a higher percentage of subjects from the device Pain relief and pain freedom at 120 minutes and 24 and 48 hours were comparable between the groups. The consistency of pain relief at 30 minutes across multiple migraine attacks was also greater, and of statistical significance, in those who received sumatriptan via the breath-powered intranasal delivery system vs. oral sumatriptan [26]. Since the dose used in this delivery is the same as that previously demonstrated effect and safe in children, it is likely to gain use and acceptance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Investigators also noted that a higher percentage of subjects from the device Pain relief and pain freedom at 120 minutes and 24 and 48 hours were comparable between the groups. The consistency of pain relief at 30 minutes across multiple migraine attacks was also greater, and of statistical significance, in those who received sumatriptan via the breath-powered intranasal delivery system vs. oral sumatriptan [26]. Since the dose used in this delivery is the same as that previously demonstrated effect and safe in children, it is likely to gain use and acceptance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The nasal spray form of sumatriptan has over the years met with much derision from patients and practitioners alike over taste and efficacy issues. A novel breath-powered intranasal device that delivers dry sumatriptan powder to the nasal mucosa [26,27] is pending approval and may well address the previous concerns.A recently published randomized double-blinded cross-over study compared sumatriptan 22 mg powder administered via a breath-powered intranasal delivery system (AVP-825) vs. oral sumatriptan 100 mg and found that the greater mean reduction in pain intensity over the first 30 minutes post dose observed in the device group was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Investigators also noted that a higher percentage of subjects from the device Pain relief and pain freedom at 120 minutes and 24 and 48 hours were comparable between the groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and 4-times greater sIgA than a nasal liquid spray. 131 Optinose is a breathactuated device for delivering powder or liquid, a schematic of the device has been published in the literature, 132 as has data on the use of sumitriptan delivered via the Optinose device. 133,134 Kurve is a device for delivering liquid formulations "via a controlled, turbulent flow," 135 the makers have published results of a pilot clinical trial detailing their intranasal insulin therapy for Alzheimer disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment A, 136 while Archimedes Pharma developed a chitosan-based formulation, ChiSys Ò , that achieved good success in a clinical trial for a Norovirus vaccine.…”
Section: Current Nasal Vaccine Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the COMPASS study (10), investigators sought to compare the safety and efficacy of sumatriptan powder (22 mg) via the same device used in the TARGET study versus oral sumatriptan (100 mg). 275 subjects were randomized to one of two treatment arms: one in which they initially received sumatriptan intranasal powder and a placebo tablet and another in which subjects received lactose powder, via an identical breathpowered delivery device, and a sumatriptan 100 mg tablet.…”
Section: Phase III Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%